Further Investigation of Drainage Height Effect on Production Rate in Vapex
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Efficient recovery of heavy oil and bitumen is still very challenging and remains a subject of ongoing researches all around the world. Thermal recovery methods are generally accepted as viable and several successful field projects based on CSS or steam flooding or SAGD have been reported. However, these processes are not universally applicable and there are many problematic heavy oil reservoirs that are not good candidates for thermal processes. Solvent based non-thermal heavy oil recovery methods are relatively new and still under development. The central idea in such techniques is to rely on solvent dissolution for viscosity reduction instead of heating. The viscosity reduction effect of solvents is comparable to that of steam. Among the solvent based methods, Vapex appears to be the most promising. Vapex is the solvent analogue of the SAGD process and uses essentially the same well configuration. A solvent vapor is injected instead of steam and the viscosity reduction occurs due to the dissolution and diffusion of the solvent in the oil. In thin heavy oil and bitumen reservoirs, where the thermal processes are likely to fail due to excessive heat losses, Vapex can be more successful. Nonetheless, the economic viability of Vapex remains uncertain due to much lower oil production rates predicted by scale-up of observed laboratory model results using the transmissibility based scaling criteria developed by Butler1. In our previously reported experimental work, it was shown that the currently used scaling methods under-predict the increase in oil production rate with increasing drainage height. A bigger height dependency of the oil rates than the square root functionality proposed by the Butler's model1 was found experimentally. This observation was based on physical models of four different sizes, the largest of which was only 60 cm tall. In this paper, the results of a new set of Vapex experiments are presented. This set of experiments has been carried out in a newly designed very large physical model, which to the best of authors’ knowledge is the largest Vapex experimental model ever fabricated. The results are, interestingly, in very good agreement with the trend of the previous experiments with the smaller models. The previously proposed scale-up relationship2 adequately predict the results obtained with the new physical model. The new results have been used to improve the previously reported empirical scale up correlation for the Vapex process. Conducting the experiments with different sand packs also reconfirms square root functionality of the dead oil production rate to the permeability.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».