MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2091340798 · doi:10.2113/gsemg.19.3-4.55

Paleoproterozoic Age Relationships in the Three Bluffs Archean Iron Formation-Hosted Gold Deposit, Committee Bay Greenstone Belt, Nunavut, Canada

2010· article· en· W2091340798 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Troy Allen Davies, Jeremy P. Richards, Robert A. Creaser, Larry M. Heaman, Thomas Chacko, Antonio Simonetti, J. Williamson, D. W. McDonald

Notice bibliographique

RevueExploration and Mining Geology · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of British Columbia
Mots-clésArcheanGreenstone beltGeologyBayBanded iron formationGeochemistryOceanography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research Article| July 01, 2010 Paleoproterozoic Age Relationships in the Three Bluffs Archean Iron Formation-Hosted Gold Deposit, Committee Bay Greenstone Belt, Nunavut, Canada* T. Davies; T. Davies 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar J.P. Richards; J.P. Richards † 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada †Corresponding Author: E-mail: Jeremy.Richards@ualberta.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar R.A. Creaser; R.A. Creaser 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar L.M. Heaman; L.M. Heaman 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar T. Chacko; T. Chacko 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar A. Simonetti; A. Simonetti 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar J. Williamson; J. Williamson 2Committee Bay Resources Ltd., #220, 9797 45 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6E 5V8, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar D.W. McDonald D.W. McDonald 2Committee Bay Resources Ltd., #220, 9797 45 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6E 5V8, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information T. Davies 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada J.P. Richards † 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada R.A. Creaser 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada L.M. Heaman 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada T. Chacko 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada A. Simonetti 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E3, Canada J. Williamson 2Committee Bay Resources Ltd., #220, 9797 45 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6E 5V8, Canada D.W. McDonald 2Committee Bay Resources Ltd., #220, 9797 45 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6E 5V8, Canada †Corresponding Author: E-mail: Jeremy.Richards@ualberta.ca Publisher: Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Received: 07 Oct 2009 Accepted: 31 Mar 2011 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 © 2011 Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum Exploration and Mining Geology (2010) 19 (3-4): 55–80. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsemg.19.3-4.55 Article history Received: 07 Oct 2009 Accepted: 31 Mar 2011 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation T. Davies, J.P. Richards, R.A. Creaser, L.M. Heaman, T. Chacko, A. Simonetti, J. Williamson, D.W. McDonald; Paleoproterozoic Age Relationships in the Three Bluffs Archean Iron Formation-Hosted Gold Deposit, Committee Bay Greenstone Belt, Nunavut, Canada. Exploration and Mining Geology 2010;; 19 (3-4): 55–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gsemg.19.3-4.55 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyExploration and Mining Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract The Three Bluffs gold deposit is located in the Committee Bay greenstone belt, which forms part of the Rae domain of the western Churchill province, Nunavut, Canada. Gold mineralization is hosted by iron formation of the Neoarchean volcanosedimentary Prince Albert Group, and is associated with silicification (quartz veining) and sulfidation of magnetite and other Fe-rich minerals.Conventional U-Pb zircon dating of a conformable dacite unit within the volcanosedimentary host-rock sequence and a crosscutting diorite intrusion confirm a ~2.7 Ga age for deposition of the supracrustal package.U-Pb monazite dates and Pb isotopic analyses of sulfides were obtained by laser ablation–multicollector–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS). A subset of U-Pb monazite (1813.8 ± 8.7 Ma) and Re-Os arsenopyrite (1822 ± 21 Ma) dates, combined with a Pb-Pb secondary errorchron age for pyrite and arsenopyrite (1829 ± 77 Ma), suggest that gold mineralization associated with sulfidation of the iron formation occurred at ~1815 Ma, prior to high-grade (upper amphibolite facies) tectonometamorphism in the Three Bluffs area (D2TB/(M2TB).An ~1815 Ma age for deposit formation is broadly consistent with evidence from elsewhere in the western Churchill province and to the southwest in Manitoba and Saskatchewan for a late Trans-Hudson (1.9–1.8 Ga) gold mineralizing event. The majority of U-Pb monazite ages form a second population at 1780.6 ± 4.2 Ma, similar to the age of the majority of Re-Os arsenopyrite analyses (1763 ± 11 Ma). These dates are thought to reflect the timing of peak M2TB metamorphism. 40Ar/39Ar dating of amphibole, biotite, and muscovite yielded plateau ages ranging from 1723.8 ± 9.0 Ma to 1710 ± 17 Ma, which are interpreted to record the timing of postpeak metamorphic cooling to below the respective closure temperatures for Ar diffusion in these minerals. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,092

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,175 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations13
Publié2010
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueExploration and Mining GeologyMême sujetGeological and Geochemical AnalysisTravaux en français237 207