MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2091522400 · doi:10.1353/sgo.2000.0005

The 1999 Tampa SEDAAG Program Report

2000· article· en· W2091522400 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSoutheastern geographer · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGeographic Information Systems Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMemphisPopularityGeographerLibrary scienceLas vegasSession (web analytics)Quarter (Canadian coin)GeographyPolitical scienceCartographyLawArchaeologyAdvertising

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Southeastern Geographer Vol. XXXX, No. 1 , May 2000, pp. 1 1 6- 1 1 7 THE 1999 TAMPA SEDAAG PROGRAM REPORT Ronald L. Mitchelson The Southeastern Division of the Association of American Geographers (SEDAAG) continues to enjoy a high level of activity, as indicated by participation at its annual meeting in Tampa, Florida. The total of 97 submissions (posters and papers) was about 20% fewer than the record number of submissions established the previous year at the Memphis meeting. The number of posters, only in their second year of program inclusion, increased from nine in 1998 to 12 for the Tampa meeting . This type of opportunity for sharing research results appears to be favorably embraced by SEDAAG's membership. While the number of posters submitted increased, the number of paper submissions fell substantially, from the record of 1 14 established at Memphis in 1998 to 85 at Tampa, a 25% decline. A slight substitution effect might be in evidence as posters' popularity could come at the expense of papers'. When paper authors, poster authors, panelists, session chairs, discussants, committee members, and World Geography Bowl participants are aggregated, slightly more than 200 program participants were listed in the Program, which has emerged as the norm for the meeting over the past five years. The total number registered was 357, for another well-attended meeting. In compliance with last year's SEDAAG decision to limit the number of Student Honors sessions to two, the Honors Committee evaluated 16 papers. Ten of these student papers were selected for competition and the remaining six were included in the regular program. Undergraduate students submitted two papers for the nonrefereed Gamma Thêta Upsilon session. Student authors and coauthors accounted for nearly 30% of total program participation. The Tampa program was organized into 22 sessions, with five concurrent sessions during much of the meeting. The program did provide a rare plenary session focused on the cultural geography of the South. Physical geography was well represented in the program with five sessions dealing with aspects of climate, geomorphology , biogeography, and hazards. Additionally, a panel session assessed the status of physical geography in the Southeast. The diversity of study in human geography also was manifest in the program, with sessions highlighting social theory , ethnicity, economic geography and development, and political geography. Land-cover change, at a variety of scales, was a focal concern in a number of papers, including those that provided a session on remote sensing. Growing interest in geographic education and learning permitted the creation of a session devoted to interesting and timely topics. An emergent theme that seems overdue is the effect of Dr. Mitchelson is Professor and Chair ofGeography at East Carolina University , Greenville, NC 27858. Internet: mitchelsonr@mail.ecu.edu. PROGRAM REPORT1 17 the Internet and the World Wide Web on geography as well as the effect of geography on the use of these new information technologies. The World Geography Bowl remains a prominent element within the annual program, with excellent leadership coming from Neal Lineback. Eighty-four students and 34 faculty facilitators, representing 17 colleges and universities, were involved in the Tampa competition. New faces appeared in the championship round as the Kentucky team bested the team from Tennessee. The victorious team included BiIaI Ingram, Mary Curran, Vincent Delcasino, Antony Holcomb, Lisa Rainey, Maureen McDorman, Tobie Saad, and Owen Dwyer. Based on the previous year's success, a student all-star team again competed against a Professional Dream Team as a warm-up to the Championship Round. The student team trounced the Dream Team, which will go unnamed here. The Local Arrangements Committee, headed up by Tracy Newsome, orchestrated a well-run meeting in Tampa. Florida's hospitality was at its best. Participants were presented with three excellent field trip opportunities, which highlighted important development trends and issues. Additionally, the Committee provided wonderful venues for the poster session, departmental displays, and vendors. The annual business meeting and the honors luncheon, which featured keynote speaker Reginald Golledge, AAG President, concluded a busy agenda. Reg delivered an inspirational talk entitled "Thoughts about Geography in the 21st Century." At the Honors Luncheon, Ron Abler, Executive Director ofthe AAG, was presented the SEDAAG Lifetime Achievement Award...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,931
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle