MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2091584292 · doi:10.1353/tech.2012.0106

Iceland Imagined: Nature, Culture, and Storytelling in the North Atlantic (review)

2012· article· en· W2091584292 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueTechnology and Culture · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStorytellingTravel writingArchbishopHistoryPopulationAtlantic WorldEthnologyAncient historyNarrativeClassicsArtLiteratureSociologyDemography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Iceland Imagined: Nature, Culture, and Storytelling in the North Atlantic Arne Kaijser (bio) Iceland Imagined: Nature, Culture, and Storytelling in the North Atlantic . By Karen Oslund. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2011. Pp. 280. $35. On 25 August 1772 the brig Sir Lawrence arrived at Reykjavik after a rough trip from England. The ship was hired by Sir Joseph Banks, who brought with him a team for making an exploratory expedition, including the botanist and Linné disciple Daniel Solander and a young Swedish student, Uno von Troil, who would later become an archbishop. Von Troil wrote a book about this expedition, describing the strange landscapes the group saw, the native population they encountered, and the hardships they met traveling through Iceland and climbing the volcano Hekla. This book was translated to several languages and spurred an interest in Iceland and the whole North Atlantic region, and many other European travelers made similar voyages in the following two centuries. In Iceland Imagined, Karen Oslund examines how some of these travelers experienced and envisioned Iceland, Greenland, and the Faroe Islands. In particular, she analyzes how visitors to the North Atlantic region experienced its landscape and nature, its technology and material culture, and its language and literary heritage. She also analyzes some examples of travels in the opposite direction, and how inhabitants from the North Atlantic experienced Denmark, England, and other places. Oslund's approach is inspired by Edward Said's classical book Orientalism (1978), where he concluded that Western writings about the Orient depict it as an irrational "other," contrasted with the rational West. The North Atlantic also served as a contrast to Europe, she argues, but in a somewhat different way. Here the categories of "self" and "other" became less distinct; this region was on the periphery of Europe, largely inhabited by people who originated from Norway with a rich cultural past in the "sagas" from medieval times. Some of the travelers emphasized the similarities with continental Europe, while others focused on the contrasts. One chapter describes how Icelandic landscapes were described and depicted by different actors and over time. While many of the early visitors emphasized the wild, harsh, and almost diabolic character of the lava landscapes and the volcanoes that shaped them, Danish travelers and artists in the late nineteenth century instead depicted serene grass meadows with volcanoes only in the far distance. These images of unthreatening landscapes served to demonstrate how Iceland was an integral part of the Danish kingdom, not so different from heathlands in Jutland. Contemporary Icelandic painters instead sought out the wild and barren landscapes, wanting to illustrate the sufferings of Icelanders under Danish rule. [End Page 702] Iceland Imagined is not easy to categorize in a specific academic field, as the narrative moves swiftly and elegantly over unusual grounds. Some chapters lean toward cultural and environmental history. Other chapters discuss the multilayered literary history and linguistics of the North Atlantic, with Danish as the administrative language spoken by officials and people of higher standing, while the large majority only spoke Icelandic, Faroese, or Inuit languages. One chapter leans toward history of technology and material culture. Here, Oslund focuses on Greenland, and points out that Europeans had an ambivalent relation to the technologies of the Inuit. Many observers admired their clothing, kayaks, dogsleds, harpoons, and other tools, which were so well adapted to the harsh conditions in Greenland, as well as the skills with which they used these tools for killing seals, whales, fish, polar bears, and other animals. In fact, the European presence in Greenland depended on these skills, since export of sealskin, whale oil, and baleen was its economic ground. Also, polar explorers like Fridtjof Nansen and Robert Peary adopted Inuit techniques such as dogsleds and harpoons for their expeditions. But the admiration for these tools was combined with a condescending view of the Inuit for the lack of improvement and development of these same tools. In eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Europe the cult of industrial progress implied that its lack was seen as deficient moral state. The final chapter discusses two present-day controversies on Iceland. One concerns a biotech firm, deCODE genetics, striving to create a genetic database of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,846
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,375

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,294
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle