MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2091630190 · doi:10.1353/hsj.2013.0022

From the Editorial Board

2013· article· en· W2091630190 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott A. Morrison

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œHigh School journal/˜The œHigh school journal · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSchool Choice and Performance
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEditorial boardPsychologyPedagogyMathematics educationEngineering ethicsLibrary scienceComputer scienceEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

From the Editorial Board Scott Morrison and Katie Caprino Recently, The New York Times ran a series of editorials that included multiple views on a variety of educational issues with implications for the nation in general and the Big Apple in particular. Various writers argued in favor of an accountability policy that favors charters, teacher evaluations, and the closure of failing schools (Canada, 2013), a coordination of services to support families, communities, and schools (Noguera, 2013), an implementation of the Common Core State Standards without a focus on value-added teacher evaluations (Stern, 2013), and a comprehensive school system that focuses on the educational and personal needs of students and abandons a reliance on a testing culture (Ravitch, 2013). While the New York City mayoral race has brought media attention to its issues of educational philosophy and policy, North Carolina, the home of The High School Journal, has also drawn coverage, generated by legislative decisions affecting its teachers, students, and communities. In addition to ending unemployment benefits and imposing voter identification requirements, North Carolina legislators significantly cut back on spending for public schools. The Editorial Board (2013) of The New York Times lamented these actions, accusing the Republican-controlled state government of "tearing down years of progress in public education, tax policy, racial equality in the courtroom and access to the ballot" (para. 2). "Though North Carolina has been growing rapidly," the Editorial Board continued, "it is spending less on schools now than it did in 2007, ranking 46th in the nation in per-capita education dollars. Teacher pay is falling, 10,000 prekindergarten slots are scheduled to be removed, and even services to disabled children are being chopped" (para. 5). The legislature also eliminated extra pay for teachers with graduate degrees, and tenure is being phased out (Bonner, 2013; Helms, 2013; Leslie, 2013). Like the Editorial Board of The New York Times, the Editorial Board of The High School Journal is concerned about the consequences of these actions. What has happened in North Carolina is not unique. Other states, such as Idaho and South Dakota, have also abandoned tenure (Lu, 2013). Regarding funding for public schools, elementary and high schools in 26 states received less state funding in the 2012-13 school year than they did the previous year, and in 35 states school funding remained less than 2008 levels (Oliff, Mai, & Leachman, 2012). Teacher retention is also making headlines. Across the nation, an increasing number of teachers are making short-term commitments to the classroom, leaving after two or three years to pursue other careers (Rich, 2013). Whereas some may argue that brief stints in public education are admirable forms of community service, we have known for decades that high-need schools have higher teacher attrition rates and often hire [End Page 1] novice teachers, resulting in students "... who most need expert teaching ... [being] continually subjected to instruction by persons who are just learning, or perhaps not learning, how to teach" (Darling-Hammond, 1990, p. 289). It is not surprising, then, that researchers have found that teacher turnover harms student achievement (Ronfeldt, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2013) and disrupts school culture and community. At The High School Journal we seek research and scholarship that will reveal how these particular legislative decisions and trends are affecting the students, faculty, and curricula of our nation's high schools. Scott Morrison scmo@live.unc.edu Katie Caprino kcaprino@live.unc.edu References Bonner, L. (2013, July 22). Teachers say NC lawmakers are forsaking education. Raleigh News & Observer. Retrieved from http://www.newsobserver.com/2013/07/22/3049030/teachers-say-lawmakers-are-forsaking.html Canada, G. (2013, September 10). Let's have more accountability. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/09/05/new-york-citys-public-education-challenges/the-next-mayor-of-new-york-needs-to-continue-to-demand-school-accountability Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Teachers and teaching: Signs of a changing profession. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 267-290). New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar Editorial Board. (2013, July 9). The decline of North Carolina. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/10/opinion/the-decline...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Science ouverte, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,263
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0140,001
Communication savante0,0100,004
Science ouverte0,0070,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0180,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œHigh School journal/˜The œHigh school journalMême sujetSchool Choice and PerformanceTravaux en français237 207