MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2091669434 · doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000148050.80749.ac

Recording Auditory Steady-State Responses in Young Infants

2004· review· en· W2091669434 sur OpenAlexaff
M. Sasha John, David K. Brown, Patricia J. Muir, Terence W. Picton

Notice bibliographique

RevueEar and Hearing · 2004
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Établissements canadiensBaycrest Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAudiologyAuditory stimuliSteady state (chemistry)PsychologyMedicineChemistryNeurosciencePerception

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In Brief Objectives: This study examined the auditory steady-state responses evoked by amplitude-modulated (AM), mixed-modulated (MM), exponentially-modulated (AM2), and frequency-modulated (FM) tones in 50 newborn infants (within 3 days of birth) and in 20 older infants (within 3–15 wk of birth). Our hypothesis was that MM and AM2 tonal stimuli would evoke larger responses than either the AM or FM tones, and that this increased size would make the responses more readily detectable. Design: Multiple auditory steady-state responses were recorded to four tonal stimuli presented simultaneously to each ear at 50 dB SPL. The carrier frequencies of the stimuli were 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz and the modulation rates were between 78 and 95 Hz. Recordings lasting 12 minutes were obtained for each of the three types of modulation: 100% AM, MM (100% AM and 20% FM) and AM2. In six infants, responses to 20% FM were also recorded. Results: In newborn infants, MM and AM2 stimuli produced responses that were on average 15% larger than AM stimuli. For AM, MM, and AM2 stimuli, the percentage of significant responses was 67%, 73%, 76%, respectively. Responses to FM stimuli were clearly evident in newborn infants and were about half the amplitude of the AM responses. Responses recorded in the older infants were 17% larger when evoked by MM and AM2 stimuli, rather than AM stimuli. Responses in the older infants were, on average, 32% larger and showed a higher incidence of significant responses than for infants in the first 3 days of life. For AM, MM, and AM2 stimuli, the percentage of significant responses was 82%, 82%, 84%, respectively. In both newborn and older infants, the overall percentage of significant responses was decreased by the 500 Hz results, which showed lower amplitudes and were less frequently detected than responses evoked by other frequencies. Conclusions: The responses to MM and AM2 tones were larger than those evoked by AM tones. Using these stimuli will increase the reliability and efficiency of evoked potential audiometry in infancy. Responses at 50 dB SPL are more easily detected at 3–15 wk of age than in the first few days after birth. Comprehensive frequency-specific testing of hearing using steady-state responses will likely be more accurate if postponed until after the immediate neonatal period. This study examined the auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) evoked by amplitude-modulated (AM), mixed-modulated (MM), and exponentially-modulated (AM2) tones in 50 newborn infants (within 3 days of birth) and in 20 older infants (within 3–15 wk of birth). Multiple ASSRs were evoked by 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz stimuli modulated between 78 and 95 Hz and presented at 50 dB SPL. In newborn infants, responses to MM and AM2 stimuli were 15% larger than AM stimuli (17% larger for older infants). For AM, MM, and AM2 stimuli, the percentage of significant responses was 67%, 73%, 76%, respectively (82%, 82%, 84%, respectively, for older infants). Older infant ASSRs were, on average, 32% larger. In both groups, the percentage of significant responses was decreased due to many 0.5 kHz ASSRs failing to reach significance. Using MM and AM2 stimuli will increase the reliability/efficiency of evoked potential audiometry in infancy. ASSRs at 50 dB SPL are more easily detected at 3–15 wk of age than just after birth. Comprehensive frequency-specific testing of hearing using steady-state responses will likely be more accurate if postponed until after the immediate neonatal period.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,109
Tête enseignante GPT0,362
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations118
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEar and HearingMême sujetHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsTravaux en français237 207