The Allied Health Care Professional's Role in Assisting Medical Decision Making at the End of Life
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As a patient approaches the end of life, he or she faces a number of very difficult medical decisions. Allied health care professionals, including speech–language pathologists (SLPs) and occupational therapists (OTs), can be instrumental in assisting their patients to make advance care plans, although their traditional job descriptions do not include this role. The allied health care professional is often in a trusted position, permitting insight into the values and beliefs of the patient and facilitating the depth of communication necessary when making difficult decisions. Professionals who work with clients at the end of life need to be aware of the many issues surrounding end-of-life decision making and the preparation of advance directives for care. This article provides an overview of the complex issues the practicing clinician needs to keep in mind when assisting clients with advance care planning. This service requires that clinicians step outside their roles as rehabilitation experts, a move that is supported by professional associations. The concepts of medical decision making and informed consent are discussed in the context of decisions made in advance of illness at the end of life. The professional needs also to be aware of the legalities of advance decision making, as laws and statutes differ between states/provinces. There are overarching pieces of legislation that inform local legal and policy issues; the impact of these is briefly addressed. Various forms of documenting advance care plans, as well as their strengths and weaknesses, are discussed. Decision models are introduced as a means of guiding the clinician to provide quality care. Means of offering practical assistance to the client, such as motivational interviewing, the careful selection of appropriate educational material, and prevention of undue influence on the patient are discussed. Finally, the role of the allied health care professional in advocating for the client during the implementation is addressed. Understanding how the advance care plan should be implemented when a patient becomes incapable is essential when advocating for and protecting the rights of the patient. When a professional is prepared with the requisite understanding of all of the facets of advance care planning, he or she can become a strong ally for the patient and the family at this very important phase of life.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».