Spalding's World Tour: The Epic Adventure That Took Baseball around the Globe—And Made It America's Game (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Spalding’s World Tour: The Epic Adventure That Took Baseball around the Globe—And Made It America’s Game Harry Jebsen Mark Lamster. Spalding’s World Tour: The Epic Adventure That Took Baseball around the Globe—And Made It America’s Game. New York: Public Affairs Press, 2006. 283 pp. Cloth, $26.00. Late-nineteenth-century baseball was a dynamic institution. Persons attracted to it recognized both an opportunity for personal profit as well as the adulation of the public. It became a road to wealth and status in which the public was generally supportive. Baseball in the 1880s was actively defining, as was much of American industry, its precarious relationship between management and labor. Baseball was similar to the rest of industry except that the worker—that is, the player—had, at least to their own perception, a more integral role in the production of the game than a typical industrial worker had in the production of an ingot of steel. By the late 1880s, labor and management were contesting for a greater percentage of the fruits of the game of baseball. Early magnates such as Albert Spalding found baseball to be a glamorous and profitable venture. Using the reserve clause and other restrictive means, the owners maintained a strong grip on the game and on the players. To further his hold on baseball and to foster his expanding empire in the sporting goods business, Spalding came up with an ingenious idea in 1888. He would take the Chicago White Stockings and a cooperative team of All Americans to Australia and New Zealand with the intention of converting the game of baseball into a global sensation. His hopes included being able to sell bats, balls, and other equipment globally; being recognized as the most important emissary for the game; being able to control players by fostering favor with important individuals whom he included on the trip; and generally being considered the most important person in the game. [End Page 132] Lamster's account of the trip, which went well beyond the Antipodes coming back to the United States via India, Egypt, and Europe, is sprightly written with significant detail on each stop and with valid consideration of Spalding's goals and aims as he came in contact with cultures that differed significantly from the United States. Lamster is quite effective at looking into the byplay between Spalding and his magnate-focused management of the National League and contrasting it with the perceptions of John Montgomery Ward and players who believed strongly that they were being shorted in salary and respect. Spalding's trip had carried with it a hope that it might head off labor discontent. The round-the-world jaunt turned out to be a domestic public relations success. It kept baseball in the press for the entire winter period when it normally received only miniscule coverage. Though The Sporting News disparaged the trip, they covered it. Following the maxim of marketing, the trip made the news steadily, if not always approvingly, throughout the winter months of 1888 and into 1889, climaxing with the early-April return to New York and barnstorming back through the east to Chicago right before the 1889 season opened. However, the expensive venture did not successfully internationalize the game. Spalding would leave equipment agents in New Zealand and Australia to promote his game and his sporting goods, but India and Egypt were not successful sites. European countries found the game an interesting spectacle, but never accepted it as their own. The internationalization of the game, displayed in recent years with the World Baseball Classic and other international tournaments, had to wait at least another fifty years before it found fertile soil in Latin America and in Asia. Ventures like Spalding's trip placed the game squarely within the context of American culture. This trip further cemented America's love affair with baseball. As it turned out, the game was entering one of its rockiest social and economic eras, the 1890s. While Spalding's tour neither prevented the dark period of an enlarged and unwieldy National League in the 1890s nor prevented other elements from financing competing leagues...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,065 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».