Incident Prevention Planning for a Sour Gas Well-Field Operation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Operations in a sour gas well field can create events that may lead tocomplaints from the local community. These events include sour gas releases, mercaptan discharges and flare operations. Conoco Canada Ltd. decided to useproven problem-solving and decisionmaking tools to create an incidentprevention plan for its seven well sites and related facilities in the Vulcan/Long Coulee area of Alberta. Process maps were used to characterize each operation and identify areas thatpotentially could lead to an incident. These operational points wererank-ordered to determine the most likely points at which incidents couldoccur. A team of experienced Conoco personnel representing operations;engineering; field services; and health, safety and environment was assembledto apply Systems Approach tools to finding alternatives that would help toprevent incidents. This led to the preparation of formal action plans that would be implementedthroughout Conoco's Vulcan/Long Coulee operations. Conoco's Vulcan/Long Coulee Incident Prevention Plan consists of the following information: Conoco is committed to continuous improvement of these operations with thegoal of preventing incidents. This paper will detail how this approach toincident prevention planning was implemented and what it would take to applythis approach in other areas. Introduction By providing companies with a set of analytical tools, the Systems Approachallows decision makers to achieve continuous environmental improvement. Using Systems Approach tools, S.E.A.L. International (S.E.A.L.) helped Conoco Canada Ltd. (Conoco) to identify effective ways of reducing gas emissions atits Vulcan/Long Coulee operations. Key strategies that contributed to theseaccomplishments included an increase in communication within the Conocoorganization and a higher level of involvement on the part of operators. Background Members of the public had complained about the odour in the vicinity of Conoco's wells in the Vulcan/Long Coulee area of Alberta, which is a sour gasfield environment. Because Conoco is strongly committed to adhering to itsenvironmental policy in addition to regulatory requirements, it wanted to adopta more proactive process for addressing emissions from its wells and relatedoperations in Vulcan/Long Coulee. It was felt that the Systems Approach wouldhelp Conoco to identify priorities for finding and implementing solutions tothis important problem. Furthermore, it was felt that the Systems Approachwould help Conoco to demonstrate to local residents the concrete actions it wastaking to protect their well being and safety. It was thought this wouldfacilitate communication with local residents before and after futureincidents, should they occur. Conoco was introduced to the Systems Approach tools in August 2001, when S.E.A.L. consultants used the tools to develop a Benchmark Assessment for Conoco's Vulcan/Long Coulee operations1. In October 2001, the SHEAR Advisor of Conoco's Vulcan operations attended a training course promoted by S.E.A.L. andled by Dr. Robert Pojasek, the developer of the Systems Approach.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».