Abstract 2286: Short term reduction in mammographic density predicts survival in breast cancer.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Back ground: Identification of the factors that predict response to treatment in breast cancer patients early after diagnosis is important in guiding the treatment strategy. High mammographic density (MD) is a risk factor for breast cancer. However no study has examined the association between change in MD and death in breast cancer survivors. We hypothesized that a short-term change in breast density may be a surrogate biomarker predicting risk of death from breast cancer and all causes. Methods: We evaluated the relationship between reduction in MD and risk of death from all causes within the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle (HEAL) Study. In a prospective observational study, we studied 403 women diagnosed with primary invasive breast carcinoma between 1995 and 1998 and followed until death or September 2009. We collected mammograms and prognostic, demographic, and lifestyle factors as well as treatments at the time of diagnosis and two years after the diagnosis was made. Mammograms were digitized and MD was measured on cranio-caudal (CC) images of the unaffected breast using a computer assisted program developed at the University of Toronto. MD reduction (MDR) was evaluated based on two mammograms; the first was taken 12 months before diagnosis, and the second approximately 24 months after diagnosis. MDR was defined as the difference between the MD of these two images (% MDR = % preMD -% postMD). Reduction in MD was categorized into a binary variable as women who had a MDR ≥5% compared to those with less than 5% reduction in MD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Breast cancer patients with 5% or more reduction in MD were younger (mean age was 55.7 compared to 58.9), more likely to be premenopausal at diagnosis (36.7% compared to 24.0%), and more likely to have a history of oral contraception (73.9% compared to 63.3%). Women with MDR ≥5% were 49% less likely to die from any cause after adjustment for age, BMI, estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, menopausal status at baseline, smoking, stage, tamoxifen use, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and study center (HR=0.51 CI: 0.3-0.86). The results were stronger when we restricted the analysis to women who were premenopausal at diagnosis. When we restricted the analysis to women who had taken tamoxifen a similar direction was observed but the results were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Result from our data suggests that reduction in mammographic density few years after breast cancer diagnosis may be used as a predictor of overall survival. Citation Format: Ali Ozhand, Roberta Mckean-Cowdin, Leslie Bernstein, Rachel Ballard-Babash, Anne McTiernan, Kathy B. Baumgartner. Short term reduction in mammographic density predicts survival in breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2286. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2286
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».