MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2093574084 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2000.0004

Flat-Footed and Fly-Blown: The Realities of Realism

2000· article· en· W2093574084 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ian Watt

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMedia, Communication, and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDecorumFellReputationRealismTasteConversationHistoryAestheticsArtArt historySociologyLiteraturePsychologyLawPolitical scienceCommunication

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Fiat-Footed and Fly-Blown: The Realities of Realismian Watt Iam, of course, immensely flattered to be invited here, and for many reasons.1 As Horace Walpole said about the unexpected success of The Castle of Otranto, "It is charming to totter into vogue."2 It is particularly charming because it lends credibility to the hypothesis of my continuing survival, which is not universally accepted: not long ago I fell into conversation with a student at Berkeley, and when, on parting, I told him my name, he answered with genuine astonishment: "Oh, I thought you were dead." A third reason, no doubt, is that I cannot claim to be wholly a stranger to what Johnson said about Richardson: that he "could not be content to sail quietly down the stream of reputation without longing to taste the froth from every stroke of the oar."3 My original difficulty in deciding whether to come and, if so, what to talk about arose partly from a sense of decorum which told me that I should not be observed visibly to agitate the stream of reputation myself; and yet this is what Paul Hunter in effect has asked me to do. The difficulty is compounded by the fact that I don't want to repeat an earlier solicited transgression in the self1 This talk was given as the plenary address to the fourth annual meeting of the Southeastern American Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, 12 March 1978. It is published jointly by the Stanford Humanities Review and Eighteenth-Century Fiction, with the permission of the Department of Special Collections, Stanford University Libraries. Bibliographical information supplied by the editors is signed "Ed." 2 Letter to George Augustus Selwyn, 2 December 1765, Letters ofHorace Walpole, ed. Mrs Paget Toynbee, 15 vols (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904), 6:367. 3 Ian Watt, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1957), p. 260. References are to this edition. EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION, Volume 12, Number 2-3, January-April 2000 148 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION congratulation line, an essay called "Serious Reflections on The Rise ofthe Novell Titles beginning with "towards" always make me wonder "Why doesn't he wait till he arrives? Then he'll know if there is anything there worth reporting." In any case, you will not expect any report from me on that vast abstraction, the "Poetics of Fiction." For the "flat-footed" pedestrian of my title is, of course, myself; and I continue to totter along the "flyblown " paths of "realism." I thought that one reasonably decorous way of fulfilling my assignment would be to avoid tracks I've made already, or that have been much noted by others, and give a biographical account of how some of the less obviously pedestrian elements in The Rise ofthe Novel came into being, mainly through the influence of that least earthbound ofall modes ofthought, the German intellectual tradition. I will then, still remaining abroad, look briefly at how the various foreign translations and the subsequentreceptions ofwhat I normally think ofas the R ofNdrew attention to some of its larger and less-noticed ideological implications. Finally there may be a stopover in Paris, before coming home to speak my mind about the representational status of fiction and, more emphatically, about the need for realism in literary criticism. The Three Periods of Composition: Thesis Looking back on the process of composition of the R of N, I have been delighted to discover a truly Hegelian pattern of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. The registered topic of my PhD dissertation in 1 938 was "The Novel and Its Reader: 1719-1754." The title reflects something of the intellectual atmosphere of Cambridge in the late 1930s. There was logical positivism. Some ofmy friends spent a good deal oftime waiting for someone to use the word "why" so that they could jump in with "But you mustn't say that. The only real questions are how questions." My research topic wholly disregarded the "why," assumed the more or less publicly attested phenomenon of the "rise of the novel," and attempted to study merely the "how." Behind my...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,080

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,056
Communication savante0,0130,014
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,284
Écart entre enseignants0,264 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetMedia, Communication, and EducationTravaux en français237 207