Rites of the Republic: Citizens' Theatre and the Politics of Culture in Southern France <i>Rites of the Republic: Citizens' Theatre and the Politics of Culture in Southern France</i> . By M <scp>ark</scp> I <scp>ngram</scp> . (Teaching Culture: UTP Ethnographies for the Classroom). Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011. xxxiv + 238 pp. Pb CAD $29.95.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
If the theatre is one of France's most evocative cultural spaces, and theatrical performance and attendance the centrepiece of cultural policy-making in the twentieth century, how exactly are the politics of the stage negotiated at everyday levels? Where and when do policy discourses enter the lived experience of theatre practitioners? Given the specific vision of Republican citizenship mobilized by the French state's cultural policies (universal, forged around a centralized cultural heritage, and wary of particular identity formations), how do artists invested in locality none the less utilize and reshape notions of universal citizenship and belonging? In an era of supranational formations, how is ‘a specifically national repertoire of values associated with culture in France’ (p. xiii) negotiated by artists with multicultural, international agendas? These are the questions that structure Mark Ingram's captivating interdisciplinary study of the relationship between cultural policy, theatre making, and citizenship in contemporary France. Drawing on an extensive ethnographic archive generated from interviews and personal participation, Ingram combines theoretical frameworks from anthropology and performance studies with policy analysis to suggest that the relationship between art making and social life is ‘an important arena in which French people have self-consciously grappled with issues of cultural heritage and social change’ (p. xxx). Following an introduction to the project's two field sites — the amateur voluntary association Théâtre Rural d'Animation Culturelle (TRAC) in Beaumes de Venise in the Vaucluse department, and the Friche arts centre located in the disadvantaged yet rapidly renovating Belle de Mai neighbourhood of Marseille — Chapter 1 provides a brief history of arts governance in France, from the Third Republic's early attempts at democratization, to Jeanne Laurent's postwar blueprint for decentralized theatrical production, to the post-1968 split between artists advocating for the autonomy of artistic processes and those insisting on the social responsibilities of animation. Against this background Chapter 2 establishes TRAC's complicated understanding of popular education, artistic practice, and valorization of rural social networks and histories. Chapter 3 analyses the Friche's position as a private Société Coopérative d'Intérêt Collectif that both draws on centralized policy principles and negotiates its inclusion in the EU's Euroméditerranée urban renovation programme. In Chapter 4 the EU's broader principle of ‘unity in diversity’ is examined in a study of how its political effects are filtered through municipal contexts, with a particular focus on Avignon and Marseille as European Capitals of Culture. Finally, Chapters 5 and 6 examine how the theatre's public dimensions and flexible, embodied nature allow the artists at the TRAC and Friche to generate a complicated and often internally contradictory discourse of culture that is plural, multilingual, and ‘preserved at a personal level and protected from the influence of a market economy’ (p. 161). Throughout, Ingram's study artfully demonstrates how the practices and ‘rites’ of state cultural policy are incorporated and negotiated at quotidian, embodied levels, even as European integration and globalization expand the scales at which individuals think and live.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».