MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2094036422 · doi:10.1080/14634988.2011.575348

From Switzerland to Canada: a diary of two Swiss Postdoctoral Fellows and Richard A. Vollenweider

2011· article· en· W2094036422 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
René Gächter, P. Stadelmann

Notice bibliographique

RevueAquatic Ecosystem Health & Management · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueIntegrated Water Resources Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEutrophicationMilestonePolitical scienceGeographyArchaeologyEcologyNutrient

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

We met Richard Vollenweider for the first time as Ph.D. students, when he presented his report entitled, Scientific fundamentals of the eutrophication of lakes and flowing waters with particular reference to nitrogen and phosphorous as factors in eutrophication (Vollenweider, 1968), to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) committee chaired by Otto Jaag, a former director of the Swiss Federal Institute for Water Resources and Water Pollution Control (EAWAG). The following experts were part of this distinguished Board: O. Jaag and K. Wuhrmann (Switzerland), H. J. Elster and W. Ohle (Germany), D. Povoledo (Italy), W. Rodhe (Sweden), P. Lieben (France), R. Owens (United Kingdom), W. E. Johnson (Canada) and E. Martin (USA). Richard's study, based on information from Swiss, European and North American lakes, proved to be a milestone for the understanding of the trophic evolution of lakes, and for the first time demonstrated phosphorus loading as being the most crucial factor for eutrophication of fresh waters (Vollenweider, 1968, 1969, 1975, 1976).This report initiated a broader OECD Cooperative Program on Eutrophication which he supervised from 1971 to 1980, as well as numerous other studies in this field worldwide. Although in reality an individual lake does not respond exactly like his “average” model, Richard's quantitative models (Vollenweider, 1976) were evident and convincing for lake managers and therefore still have an immense impact on fighting against eutrophication today.Although Richard had placed the cornerstone for his reputation worldwide, the Swiss scientific community had not yet recognized his extraordinary qualities. So, as the prophet had no honor in his own country, the highly cited Swiss limnologist responded to an appointment from Canada, offering him a leading position at the Canada Centre for Inland Waters (CCIW) in Burlington, Ontario. In the early seventies, we both had the opportunity to follow him to Canada and to work as postdoctoral fellows under his supervision on the Laurentian Great Lakes. When we arrived at CCIW, we met Mohi Munawar, Richard's first postdoctoral Fellow, who was engaged in phytoplankton dynamics and primary productivity studies. In fact we became good friends while we worked actively in the International Field Year for Great Lakes (IFYGL). This provided an opportune time to work closely with Richard who was very helpful in formulating scientific projects and in analyzing research results. His guidance and support resulted in the publication of several papers in a short period of time (Gächter et al., 1973; Munawar et al., 1974; Stadelmann and Munawar, 1974; Stadelmann et al., 1974; Vollenweider et al., 1974).At CCIW we both experienced exiting and very interesting insights into Great Lakes research. However, we admit that we did not first succeed in becoming acquainted socially with Richard. His nickname, “Doctor God,” explains how we felt when he joined us young post docs, with little self-confidence, in the CCIW cafeteria. Just imagine a tight-lipped God with his immense scientific aura, speaking seven languages, sitting down at your table! Our colleagues were always suspicious about the three quiet Swiss sitting together! When he asked us to cut his lawn while he was abroad we felt obliged to help him in return for all the guidance he had provided. We knew that if no neighbor complained about the growth of yellow dandelions, he was happy with our work and in return invited us to a decent Italian dinner prepared by his wife Roberta.Even after returning to Switzerland, Richard visited us in Canada several times, being very much interested in the restoration program of various Swiss lakes through phosphorus loading reduction, as well as oxygenation and forced mixing, and wanting to share that information (Vollenweider, 1987; Gächter, 1987; Gächter and Stadelmann, 1993; Stadelmann and Gächter, 1993; Gächter and Wehrli, 1998).We were delighted to hear the news in 1986 that together with Werner Stumm (former Director of EAWAG), Richard was awarded the Tyler Environmental Prize. But mostly, we are grateful for having had the chance to learn from these two great Swiss teachers/scientists who expanded our scientific horizons.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,173
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,348

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0370,008
Communication savante0,0120,005
Science ouverte0,0020,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAquatic Ecosystem Health & ManagementMême sujetIntegrated Water Resources ManagementTravaux en français237 207