MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2094676501 · doi:10.1353/can.2007.0045

Canada’s Religions: An Historical Introduction (review)

2007· article· en· W2094676501 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
David B. Marshall

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChristianityWorshipReligious studiesProtestantismReligious pluralismSpiritualityMeaning (existential)History of religionsPluralism (philosophy)SociologyHistoryTheologyPhilosophyEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Canada's Religions: An Historical Introduction David B. Marshall Canada's Religions: An Historical Introduction. Robert Choquette. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2004. Pp. xviii, 464, illus., b&w, $19.95 paper, $65 cloth In today's secular age, knowledge of the foundations of religion, let alone religious history, can no longer be assumed. Indeed the religious beliefs and worship practices of all faiths need to be outlined for today's students, many of whom have neither been exposed to traditional religious teachings nor attended a worship service or church. Basics, including the Protestant and Catholic reformations, the reasons for missionary outreach, the meaning of sacraments and rituals, the character and meaning of sacred texts, and what happens in worship services need to be explained before the history of religion in Canada can be told. This book is remarkably successful at outlining these basics. The outstanding quality of this survey, however, is Choquette's attention to religious diversity. Unlike previous surveys, this book is not about the Christian church or Christianity but religions in Canada. Moreover, he achieves a good blend of the social historians' emphasis on people's religious beliefs and practices with the more traditional church historian's emphasis on institutions, elites, teachings, and doctrine. Readers are immediately alerted to Choquette's emphasis on religious pluralism, as the book opens with a discussion of Amerindian religion, not Christianity. After Choquette has outlined the major features of Native spirituality, he directs his attention to Christianity. His discussion of the Christian roots of Canadian society begins with a survey of religion in Europe at the dawn of the effort to evangelize the New World. In Choquette's analysis of the efforts of Christian missionaries to convert Amerindians, he outlines the impact of contact on both Native spiritual life and Christianity. Missionary effort is not a one-way street, for contact can change the [End Page 317] missionary and the evangelizing religion as well as those that are subject to conversion attempts. Choquette does not fall into the trap of arguing that during contact or missionary outreach Christianity was all-powerful and therefore totally destructive. He is aware of the limits of the missionary enterprise and recognizes that contact profoundly influenced Christianity and its missionaries. Later in the text he discusses examples of Native spiritual renaissance among missionized Natives. Wherever possible, Choquette discusses popular piety and in doing so he reflects recent scholarship that concentrates on religious practice and how people prayed or worshipped. Historians of Quebec have produced some of the most innovative work on popular piety, and Choquette's sections on Catholicism in French-Canadian society reflect this dynamic scholarship. For example, in the chapter on the development of the Catholic church in New France, Choquette provides an insightful description of the pilgrimages and shrines that characterized popular piety in the colony. In analyzing the nineteenth century, Choquette discusses the overwhelming importance of the evangelicalism within both Protestantism and Catholic ultramontanism. As a result of this comparative perspective, some of the standard interpretations of Canadian religious history are challenged. Canadian historiography has been dominated by the idea of Catholic–Protestant rivalry, what Arthur Lower called the 'primary antithesis' in Canadian life. This division within Christianity was responsible for a great deal of the political debate and social conflict in Canada. But in Choquette's analysis it becomes clear that both Protestantism and Catholicism were experienced in similar ways. Both were swept up by the evangelical crusade of the nineteenth century, battled with the forces of modernism, and gave voice to the prophetic in their calls for social justice. When one moves away from an exclusively Christian perspective, some of the differences between Catholicism and Protestantism fade and some of the underlying similarities between these two central branches of Christianity become clear. Choquette does not dismiss the presence of Protestant–Catholic rivalry. Instead Protestant–Catholic relations are viewed as an interplay of similarities and differences rather than unrelenting conflict. Not surprisingly, Choquette is alive to the many religious alternatives that challenged the churches and the dominant evangelical faith of the nineteenth century. This diversity was based on official religious tolerance that was established under British rule after the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,464
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,934

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0080,021
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical Review→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→