Improved Recovery of Heavy Oil by Vapex with Widely Spaced Horizontal Injectors and Producers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process, which usually employs horizontal injection and production wells, has been applied successfully in producing heavy oil reservoirs. It allows high recoveries to be obtained, at high rates without significant bypass of steam. However, SAGD process, due to the heat loss to the overburden and adjacent formations, can only be used for thick reservoirs with relatively high porosities and oil saturations if there is to be an economic oil/steam ratio. The Vapex process, which uses light hydrocarbon vapors to extract heavy oil from the reservoir, is studied experimentally in the work described in this paper using a new, longer, scaled, packed model. In the process that evolved from the work, liquid solvent (propane, butane, or mixtures) is injected with a small amount of non-condensible gas through a horizontal well at the top of the reservoir to contact and mobilize oil by dilution. The diluted oil is produced by a horizontal well, laterally separated from the injector, and located at the bottom of the reservoir. With this configuration, practical production rates can be achieved without appreciable gas bypass. Solvent is separated easily from the produced liquid by distillation and recycled and this results in relatively low net solvent requirements. Gas fills the vacated pores. The objective of the experiments was to develop process conditions to give high oil production rates with economic solvent requirements. To achieve this, major parameters affecting the Vapex performance were investigated: temperature, pressure, solvent injection rates, types of solvent, mixed solvents, well spacing and configurations etc. The major finding has been that wider lateral well spacing allow higher production rates and make the process more economic. Experimental results indicate that, under suitable conditions, the net solvent injection is about 0.2 B per B of produced oil and that high recoveries and practical rates are achievable. For example, a field prediction based on the experimental data indicates an average oil production rate of 450 B/D per horizontal well pair, 1,000 m long, drilled in a pressure-depleted, heavy-oil reservoir that is 10 m thick, to give a recovery of over 50% OOIP for a 70 acre pattern. Introduction The concept of Vapex evolves from the Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) process in which two closely spaced horizontal wells are employed with steam injected from an upper horizontal injector to form a steam chamber in the formation and heated oil drains downwards, driven by gravity, to a horizontal producer located near the base of reservoir. Another form of the process involves the use of multiple vertical injection wells instead of the horizontal injector. In the Vapex process, light hydrocarbon vapors or their mixtures with non-condensible gases are employed instead of steam to extract heavy oil or bitumen from the formation. Compared to thermal processes, the Vapex process can be operated at reservoir temperature with almost no heat loss. Vapex can be used as an alternative to recover the heavy oil and bitumen from reservoirs which are not suitable for thermal processes such as reservoirs with bottom water and/or high water saturation, vertical fractures, low porosity and low thermal conductivity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».