Assessing juvenile offenders: Preliminary data for the Australian adaptation of the youth level of service/case management inventory (Hoge & Andrews, )
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract*Some of the psychometric results were presented by Thompson, A. P., & Pope, Z. (2003). The conceptual and psychometric basis for risk – need assessment in juvenile justice. In M. Katsikitis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 38th APS Annual Conference (pp. 224 – 228). Melbourne: The Australian Psychological Society.The developmental phase and preliminary psychometric data are reported for an Australian adaptation of an assessment inventory for juvenile offenders. Specifically, the Australian Adaptation of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI-AA, Hoge, & Andrews, Citation1995) is used to assess risks, needs and strengths to inform decision making with juvenile offenders. Data from a sample of 290 juvenile offenders were used to analyse item and score characteristics which, with few exceptions, performed in keeping with traditional psychometric standards. Predictive validity in a subsample of 174 males followed for recidivism between 6 and 32 months resulted in a correlation of 0.28 and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.67 for the total score on the inventory. The results and use of the inventory are placed in the context of related developments in other jurisdictions. AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Collaborative Research Unit of the NSW Department of Juvenile Justice for their assistance in undertaking this research. The opinions here do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSW Department of Juvenile Justice, or any of its officers. Zoe Pope is now at Forensic Services, Mental Health ACT, Australia.Notes*Some of the psychometric results were presented by Thompson, A. P., & Pope, Z. (2003). The conceptual and psychometric basis for risk – need assessment in juvenile justice. In M. Katsikitis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 38th APS Annual Conference (pp. 224 – 228). Melbourne: The Australian Psychological Society.1 Apart from suiting the Australian context, the adaptation was needed to accommodate, in particular, an older age-range. The Canadian inventory was developed for use with 12 – 16-year-old offenders and norms are for 12 – 17 years. In NSW, a single government department deals with 10 – 18-year-old offenders.2 There were seven instances in which the time to reconviction was less than 2.5 months. It is possible that these were outstanding rather than new charges. Reported predictive validity analysis included these cases, as the results were virtually identical to when they were excluded.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle