Lipid excipients Peceol and Gelucire 44/14 decrease P-glycoprotein mediated efflux of rhodamine 123 partially due to modifying P-glycoprotein protein expression within Caco-2 cells.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine the influence of two lipid excipients, Peceol(c) and Gelucire(c) 44/14 on P-glycoprotein (Pgp) activity and protein expression in human colon adenocarcinoma cells (Caco-2). Lipid excipients are increasingly used as drug delivery systems for hydrophobic drugs to increase their bioavailability by overcoming the barrier of low absorption. This study will probe a novel mechanism by which lipid excipients reduce Pgp-mediated efflux and thereby increase bioavailability of orally administered therapeutics. METHODS: Non-cytotoxic concentrations of Peceol(c) and Gelucire(c) 44/14 were determined for 24-hour treatments of Caco-2 cells using integrity of the cell membranes and mitochondrial respiration as markers. Pgp activity after treatment with non-cytotoxic concentrations of Peceol(c) and Gelucire(c) 44/14 was measured with a fluorescent Pgp substrate, rhodamine 123 (Rh123). The activity of Pgp was ascertained by measuring accumulation and the directional flux of Rh123 using the Transwell(c) semi-permeable cell culture support system. To assess the effect of Peceol(c) and Gelucire(c) 44/14 on Pgp protein expression, Western blotting with a specific Pgp antibody was performed. RESULTS. The two assays for cytotoxicity were in agreement and showed that concentrations of less than 0.5% (v/v) Peceol(c) and less than 0.02% (w/v) Gelucire(c) 44/14 were not toxic to Caco-2 cells. Rh123 accumulation was increased up to 3-fold in cells treated with sub-toxic concentrations of the excipients. The flux of Rh123 across the cell monolayer was unaffected by treatment in the absorptive (apical to basolateral) direction but the efflux transport was reduced after treatment with Peceol(c), Gelucire(c) 44/14 or the positive control , 100microM verapamil. Some of the reduction in Pgp efflux activity can be explained by the reduction in protein expression after treatment with the lipid excipients; treatment with 0.25% (v/v) and 0.5% (v/v) Peceol(c) reduced Pgp protein levels to 62.4% and 68.4% of the control respectively while Gelucire(c) 44/14 treatments of 0.01% (w/v) and 0.02% (w/v) reduced Pgp to 64.5% and 51.8% respectively. CONCLUSION: In this study we utilized established methodologies to assess the inhibitory effect of the excipients on the Pgp-mediated efflux of the probe, Rh123 and tested the hypothesis that long-term treatment of Caco-2 cells with the lipid excipients, Peceol(c) and Gelucire(c) 44/14, decreased Pgp protein expression. The results suggest a new mechanism which may contribute to the improved bioavailability seen for drugs formulated with lipid-based excipients.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».