MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2095938052 · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2009.00981_2.x

Establishing a national monitoring programme for White‐shouldered Ibis in Cambodia

2009· article· en· W2095938052 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hugh L. Wright, Bou Vorsak, Nigel Collar, Thomas N. E. Gray, Iain Lake, Sum Phearun, Hugo Rainey, Rours Vann, Sok Ko, Paul M. Dolman

Notice bibliographique

RevueIbis · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIbisWhite (mutation)White paperGeographyEcologyArchaeologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

White-shouldered Ibis Pseudibis davisoni is perhaps the most threatened of South-East Asia’s waterbirds (Tordoff et al. 2005). Previously occurring across Indochina, including Thailand, Myanmar, Laos and Vietnam, the majority of remaining White-shouldered Ibis are now restricted to Cambodia. A rapid decline in the 20th century (Timmins & Soriyun 1998) has left a fragmented population believed to consist of 50–249 mature individuals (BirdLife International 2009). Cambodian populations are restricted to dry dipterocarp forests and the Mekong River channel in the north and east. The size and status of these populations are not clearly understood. Forest landscapes contain seasonal pools, active and fallow rice fields, grasslands and stream channels. Understanding the habitat selection of the species may enable habitat management to become a core component of conservation interventions. This project aimed to develop surveys that would increase scientific knowledge in these areas. Nationwide White-shouldered Ibis research requires cooperation between conservation NGOs and government ministries. A workshop held in Phnom Penh on 3 February 2009 was attended by representatives from the University of East Anglia, BirdLife International, Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), World Wide Fund for Nature, Forestry Administration of Cambodia and Ministry of Environment of Cambodia; all these stakeholders agreed to collaborate in the project. Coordinated activities between more than two NGOs are rare in Cambodia. Participants also discussed research activities and exchanged experience from their respective project sites. The survey of habitat use by foraging White-shouldered Ibis was designed for use by local field staff and rangers. Staff surveyed routes of their choice recording every White-shouldered Ibis encounter and the habitat it was using. Search effort was accounted for by using survey route tracks (recorded with GPS) and GIS analysis to determine distance travelled per habitat type. The protocol was implemented at five sites: Western Siem Pang IBA, Kulen Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary, Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary, the ‘central section’ of the Mekong River and Mondulkiri Protected Forest. The first four sites cover most of the current known population, while the last site contains potentially suitable habitat. Training of local staff was critical to the survey’s success. Fifteen people received presentations and 3–4 days of intensive field practice, during which they were taught the recording process, waterbird identification, GPS use and the conservation importance of the work. Staff showed good learning capacity but follow-up visits at monthly intervals were used in summer 2009 to improve data accuracy and reliability. Currently available data provide preliminary results that ongoing surveys (conducted until 2011) will confirm. White-shouldered Ibis appear to stop visiting seasonal pools in the forest after the first rains in April/May (Wright et al. 2009). In the wet season they can be found foraging in open forest, fallow rice fields and wet grasslands. The forest is routinely burnt by humans and grazed by domestic livestock, whereas rice fields and grasslands have direct anthropogenic origin. White-shouldered Ibis may be dependent on anthropogenic landscapes in the wet season, a time when chicks have recently fledged and require provisioning. The gregarious roosting behaviour of White-shouldered Ibis in the wet season provides an opportunity for systematic counts. Roost sites were found by local staff and through roost-finding reward schemes in the local community. Local staff at four sites were trained to count at roosts without double-counting birds. A total of 161 White-shouldered Ibis were found at a single roost in Western Siem Pang IBA on 19 June 2009. This is the highest number ever recorded in a single group and demonstrates that this unprotected site contains the most globally important population. Nationwide coordinated roost counts took place on 28–29 July, 3–4 September and 3–4 October 2009 across the four sites. All known roosts were visited in the evening and the following morning to improve accuracy. A total of 23 people took part in the counts, including local staff and community members given training for the event. A total of 310 birds were counted on 28–29 July, the highest number of White-shouldered Ibis ever recorded and the best estimate of true population size to date. This probably exceeds BirdLife International’s (2009) estimate of 50–249 mature individuals, although age of individuals is not captured by roost counts. This total also corroborates Timmins’s (2008) suggestion that the Cambodian population comprises fewer than 500 birds. While this finding is encouraging for the species’ prospects, it most probably reflects improved survey effort rather than population recovery. Nevertheless, the result gained attention in the media and widely raised awareness of the species. The September and October counts found lower numbers (140 and 289 birds, respectively) owing to poor accessibility and changes in roost site selection. Even so, 76 birds were found at Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary, making this population substantially larger than expected and suggesting 340 birds is the likely minimum total in Cambodia. Up to 46 birds were recorded in Kulen Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary, the largest count in 6 years of roost observations. WCS data suggest a population increase here, coinciding with conservation interventions including nest protection efforts. In July, 99 birds were found on the ‘central section’ of the Mekong River, indicating that this site (like Western Siem Pang IBA) needs protected status and an effective management plan urgently. Further roost counts will take place in the summer of 2010. Better understanding of the population through roost counts could have substantial implications, as downgrading the species’ status to Endangered becomes a possibility. Sites where White-shouldered Ibis is found to be abundant will gain enhanced conservation value. Comparing encounter rates between sites will determine the importance of site-specific factors such as human population, livestock density and landscape composition. A better understanding of habitat use of foraging White-shouldered Ibis will help conservation practitioners to design and implement habitat management with optimal efficiency. Results will be disseminated through a PhD Thesis (due in late 2011) and scientific papers submitted for publication in 2012. The project received a research grant of £1995 from the BOU in 2009 for which the project leader is extremely grateful. The project leader also wishes to thank BirdLife International in Indochina, Wildlife Conservation Society Cambodia Program and World Wide Fund for Nature Cambodia Programme for their full support and cooperation in the project. The implementation of surveys would not have been possible without the participation and hard work of field staff and rangers at each site. Thanks also go to Men Phymean of Forestry Administration and H.E. Chay Samith of GDANCP, Ministry of Environment of Cambodia. Tom Evans, Richard Zanre, Jonathan Eames and Keo Omaliss provided useful technical advice. This research received additional funding from the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund and the Natural Environment (NERC) and Economic and Social Research Councils (ESRC) of the UK.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,305

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,245 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueIbisMême sujetWildlife Ecology and ConservationTravaux en français237 207