Guarding and Transmitting the Vulnerability of the Historical Referent
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In her essay "Truth and Politics," Hannah Arendt distinguishes between "rational truth" and "factual truth." 1 Arendt associates "rational truth" with durability: the human mind will always be able to reproduce axioms, rational discoveries, and theories, so "the burning of all books of geometry would not be radically effective" (TP, 230).On the other hand, when it comes to "factual truth," or the historical referent, we are dealing with something much more fragile that is in danger of being lost forever.Given that historical facts and accounts of events are the outcomes of human beings living and acting together in an ever-changing context -given that historical facts depend on the precariousness of human relationality rather than solitary deductions -Arendt notes that once the historical referent is lost, "no rational effort will ever bring [it] back" (TP, 231, emphasis added).Arendt admits that this is a distinction made "for the sake of convenience" (Ibid.), in order to call our attention to the fragility of the historical referent.Arendt's distinction thus prompts us to appreciate the inherent vulnerability of the past and leads us to recognize the work of remembrance: the fact that the historical referent needs our effort of referencing and recitation in the present in order to survive, to gain countenance, to gather significance, and so to provide us with our bearings in the world.This is an activity that the individual cannot properly undertake by herself; it is always related to others as part of forging a common world.And forging a common world necessarily implies pining for significance -for "the transformation of the given raw material" into a story that can be told (TP, 262).Arendt proposes that the work of preserving the historical referent is vested in a community of interpreters, who can respect the implied double bind in this endeavor: namely, that "even if we admit that every generation has the right to write its historyto rearrange the facts [so that they can convey a meaningful story that will resonate in the present]; we don't admit the right to touch the factual matter itself" (TP, 239).But who makes up this community of interpreters?Noting that the price of the freedom to act in politics includes both the potential of lying and the devastating erasure of the referent by the "modern lie," Arendt, by the end of her essay, invokes two public institutions that are vested with the power to shelter the historical referent.Specifically, she names the judiciary and education as two public spaces that, although they are established and supported by the powers that be, stand outside the struggle of politics in their endeavor to preserve and faithfully guard factual truth.The judiciary and education are carefully protected against social interests and political power, and thus simultaneously provide both a refuge and an active site for the faithful interpretation and dissemination of history.As Arendt writes, "the humanities, which are supposed to find out, stand guard over, and interpret factual
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle