High-resolution spatial rupture pattern of a multiphase flower structure, Rex Hills, Nevada: New insights on scarp evolution in complex topography based on 3-D laser scanning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research Article| May 01, 2010 High-resolution spatial rupture pattern of a multiphase flower structure, Rex Hills, Nevada: New insights on scarp evolution in complex topography based on 3-D laser scanning Ramona Baran; Ramona Baran † Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Luisenstrasse 37, 80333 Munich, Germany †E-mail: ramona.baran@iaag.geo.uni-muenchen.de Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Bernard Guest; Bernard Guest § Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Luisenstrasse 37, 80333 Munich, Germany §Current address: Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive Northwest, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada, e-mail: bguest@ucalgary.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Anke M. Friedrich Anke M. Friedrich # Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Luisenstrasse 37, 80333 Munich, Germany #E-mail: friedrich@lmu.de Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ramona Baran † Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Luisenstrasse 37, 80333 Munich, Germany Bernard Guest § Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Luisenstrasse 37, 80333 Munich, Germany Anke M. Friedrich # Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Luisenstrasse 37, 80333 Munich, Germany †E-mail: ramona.baran@iaag.geo.uni-muenchen.de §Current address: Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive Northwest, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada, e-mail: bguest@ucalgary.ca #E-mail: friedrich@lmu.de Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 09 Sep 2008 Revision Received: 03 Jun 2009 Accepted: 05 Jun 2009 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 © 2010 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2010) 122 (5-6): 897–914. https://doi.org/10.1130/B26536.1 Article history Received: 09 Sep 2008 Revision Received: 03 Jun 2009 Accepted: 05 Jun 2009 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Ramona Baran, Bernard Guest, Anke M. Friedrich; High-resolution spatial rupture pattern of a multiphase flower structure, Rex Hills, Nevada: New insights on scarp evolution in complex topography based on 3-D laser scanning. GSA Bulletin 2010;; 122 (5-6): 897–914. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B26536.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract Fault scarps represent the most obvious expression of tectonic activity at the Earth's surface. Studies on scarp morphology place constraints on fault kinematics and scarp-degradation processes, and were often based on geomorphic dating techniques. Fault scarps exposed in areas of simple topography facilitate data acquisition and interpretation, whereas little work had been done where fault scarps are superimposed on complex, dissected topography. Fault scarps developed in complex topography are commonly observed along flower structures and at tips of strike-slip faults. Such structures are important elements for evaluating the evolution and linking of strike-slip fault systems, and appear to be scale-independent from several meters to hundreds of kilometers. We examined the detailed meter- to hundred meter–scale structure and surface expression of a flank of one fault scarp–bounded pressure ridge (Rex Hills flower structure) by combining field mapping with high-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) analysis. Based on terrestrial laser scanning we generated a detailed DEM and extracted high-resolution topographic cross sections, which enabled us to identify fault scarps and to determine their relative ages and geometry. Our study site is located on the transpressional left-bend between the Pahrump and Amargosa segments of the dextral Stateline fault system. The topography is characterized by alternating valleys and ridges (each ∼100 m long, relief of ∼4 m). We observed the following: the southern Rex Hills slope exhibits three fault scarps related to three reverse fault branches; the basal scarp (scarp 1) is most continuous, and exhibits five segments, the upper two scarps (scarps 2 and 3) are less continuous. Furthermore, fault scarps exposed on ridge crests are more numerous (up to four to five scarps), and smaller (∼5 m high); valleys often exhibit single large (>10 m high), smoothed scarps. To easily detect differences between the scarps, we evaluated the height and slope angle of the scarps using topographic cross sections. Our analysis indicates that scarp shape is influenced by fault dip, lithology, and degradation processes resulting in large scatter and broad overlap in scarp-height–slope-angle space. The analysis further indicates that scarp degradation is stronger in the valleys, and that the preservation potential of small, individual fault scarps is therefore greater on the ridge crests. We compared our fault-scarp data with published, calibrated data yielding an age of ∼2 ka for the Rex Hills scarps consistent with an earlier finding. This suggests that the scarp shape mainly reflects progressive degradation since the most recent surface rupture. Our approach of analyzing high-resolution topographic data of closely spaced fault scarps is promising especially when combined with subsurface data as well as geochronological and paleoseismic data, and it provides a basic scheme for analyzing scarp populations in a complex topographic region. Despite the absence of subsurface data, our approach allowed the study of complex high-resolution fault-scarp morphologies across a flower structure for the first time. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».