MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W209638383

Developing and Marketing a Faith-Based Practice: Mission and Business

2007· article· en· W209638383 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth Van Wyk, Connie Ratliffe

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œJournal of psychology and Christianity · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligion, Society, and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpiritualityFaithPopulationMental healthMental illnessManaged carePsychologyHealth carePublic relationsMedicinePsychiatryEconomic growthPolitical scienceEconomicsAlternative medicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Providing faith oriented services to the psychotherapy consumer presents challenges for the integration of faith with the business of managing a clinical practice. Using both American and Canadian experience, we are proposing that a faith based clinical practice is a viable model for providing professional clinical services. As clinicians interested in integrating their spirituality in the therapeutic relationship, we will address some of the practical issues confronting those who offer spiritual resources in clinical settings. The Economic Climate Clinicians are not used to thinking that in economic terms, psychotherapy is a discretionary service. It is our experience that there is a strong correlation between the availability of discretionary household income and the choice to enter psychotherapy. In a tight economy people will choose to spend their income on meeting basic needs rather than on luxury products and services. Canadian studies have estimated that nearly one in five Canadian adults will personally experience a mental illness during a 1 year period (Health Canada, 2002). People in the United States with low incomes and no insurance are nearly twice as likely as the general population to be diagnosed with mental illness (Mauksch et al., 2001). Governments and insurance or managed care companies make similar economic decisions. When money is tight, mental health needs receive lower priority even though the tight economy puts more pressure and stress on the part of the population that is vulnerable. According to the Psychotherapy Finances' 2000 survey, income from psychotherapy was very stable in the 1990's, but the income of psychotherapists has dropped by 22% since 2000. Three reasons for the change in the economics of clinical practice were identified. First is the introduction of managed care in the United States. Managed care treats psychotherapy as a commodity. Based on diagnosis, a specific therapeutic regime is prescribed and a length of treatment is expected without regard to either the specific circumstances of the patient or the unique qualifications of the therapist. In a mature market place where overall product quality is high and where there is an abundance of trained clinicians, product differentiation is determined by price and psychotherapy becomes a commodity. Managed care companies are paying between $00 to $75 per session and capping the number of treatment sessions. The therapist's credentials and qualifications are secondary in an empirically based treatment approach. The second economic factor is the erosion of self paying clients. According to the Psychotherapy Finances data, self paying clients were averaging 44% of a clinical practice in the 1990's but have declined to about 20% of a clinical practice at present. The specific economic circumstances of the geographic area of your practice may make a difference; your practice economics will be different depending on whether your local economy is growing or in distress. Third, the overhead costs of maintaining a practice have not gone down. About 30% to 45% of the income from your practice goes to keeping the lights on. The costs of insurance, professional accreditation and ongoing training are not going down. Clinical practice is a business, as well as mission driven, and the economics of psychotherapy matter. Developing a clinical practice that provides a living wage has been a challenge since professional psychotherapy first began. Freud acknowledged the challenges of economic fluctuations in his practice. In a letter to Wilhelm Fliess in 1899, Freud wrote: My mood also depends very strongly on my earnings. Money is a laughing gas for me. I know from my youth that once the wild horses of the pampas have been lassoed, they retain a certain anxiousness for life. Thus I came to know the helplessness of poverty and continually fear it. You will see that my style will improve and my ideas will be more correct if this city provides me with an ample livelihood. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,629
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,614

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,364
Écart entre enseignants0,337 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œJournal of psychology and ChristianityMême sujetReligion, Society, and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207