MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2097142316 · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00840.x

Territories of Chance Meet Territories of Choice

2007· article· en· W2097142316 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kate O’Neill

Notice bibliographique

RevueConservation Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArchaeology and Natural History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsInterdependenceBiodiversityAlliancePolitical scienceDiversity (politics)Work (physics)GeographyNational parkScale (ratio)Environmental ethicsEcologyLawArchaeologyEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Conservation across Borders. Biodiversity in an Interdependent World. Chester, C. C. 2006 . Island Press , Washington , D.C. 277 (xv + 262) pp . $60.00 (hardcover). ISBN 1-55963-610-6 . $29.95 (paperback). ISBN 1-55963-611-4 . Conserving biological diversity across national borders is difficult. Mobilizing civil organizations across borders to work together over an extended period of time toward any goal is even harder, especially when that goal involves working within and across complex social, ecological, and political systems on a large scale. The great strength of Charles C. Chester's Conservation across Borders: Biodiversity in an Interdependent World lies in his detailed and carefully researched case studies of the experiences of two very different transboundary civil organizations: the International Sonoran Desert Alliance (ISDA), operating across the U.S.–Mexico border, and the Yellowstone to Yukon conservation initiative (Y2Y), covering the “wild Rockies” from Wyoming in the United States up to the Yukon territory in Canada. Both organizations came together in the early 1990s, seeking to manage biodiversity conservation on an unprecedented scale, and both faced considerable challenges, internal and external, in meeting their goals. Chester's nuanced account of their very different experiences is based on interviews with key participants, archival research, and a keen understanding of the political contexts in each region and makes compelling reading for natural and social scientists and students working on biodiversity issues and civil society activism. This book would work very well in environmental studies courses that focus on transboundary and nonstate environmental politics in North America. It is also a good model for graduate students seeking to do similar research. From its beginnings, the ISDA was a “tri-cultural” alliance, bringing together U.S., Mexican, and Native American representatives to focus on environmental protection, sustainable development, and international communication in the western Sonoran desert region. Its broad mission also included taking into account human needs in a region identified with economic depression and border problems such as illegal immigration and drug smuggling. Its very inclusiveness and breadth of mission made its work critical and quite a bit harder, marking the first time such cross-cultural (and multilingual) cooperation had occurred in that region. Chester enumerates the very different activities that the ISDA has been involved in. At the core of the story (amid numerous, although smaller, successes) is its failed attempt to work with U.S. and Mexican governments to set up an International Biosphere Reserve in the region in the mid-1990s. This turned out to be a badly timed initiative, with U.S. federal authorities turning away from international environmental agreements and a significant domestic backlash against UN-led conservation initiatives (such as UNESCO-designated world heritage zones). More important than this failure, however, Chester demonstrates how ISDA picked itself up and carried on in the western Sonoran desert, albeit at a lower profile, working toward, for example, a rejuvenation of the gateway town of Ajo. The Y2Y, by contrast, was a very different sort of organization from the outset. Chester traces how the iconic “Yellowstone to Yukon” landscape served as a mobilizing and unifying “vision” for an alliance made up primarily of conservation science and activist organizations across the region. In its early years it remained more or less within these communities, but began to broaden its reach in the early 2000s, particularly by reaching out to Native American communities. Rather than specific achievements, Chester points to Y2Y's success in reframing the conservation debate in the northern Rockies, encouraging conservationists to think across borders and on a far larger scale than they had previously and providing a highly effective networking venue. Like ISDA, Y2K has not gone unchallenged. It, too, faced something of a right-wing, “anti-Black Helicopter” backlash. Yet, for reasons the author enumerates, the organization has prevailed and, in the words of some, redefined the conservation landscape in the northern Rockies. In the final comparative chapter, Chester identifies eight variables that shaped the impact and effectiveness of each organization: mission breadth, constituency inclusion, communication systems, scientific participation and support, leadership dynamics, political backlash, and landscape vision (pp. 228–234). Chester wisely avoids the trap of comparing the two organizations directly, instead taking into account the very different organizational and political conditions under which each was operating. The ISDA, for example, by aiming for a broad reach from the outset was constantly mediating tri-cultural and tri-lingual challenges and had to deal with far more toxic border politics than did Y2Y. It is significant that the only real discussion given to the U.S.–Canadian border is in terms of “cross-border learning,” as opposed to the significant space given to problems within and between the United States and Mexico around regional cooperation and environmental protection. Even within the limits of these two cases, he draws out insights worthy of further research. The one I found most striking is that full participation by all local stakeholders from the beginning may not be the most effective way to achieve material goals, although it may have critical “by-products” in terms of communication and learning. I may be exaggerating Chester's findings somewhat, but given recent trends in community-based conservation, it is worth some thought. In the early chapters of Conservation across Borders, Chester discusses the way human-made borders, particularly in North America, create “territories of chance,” which rarely coincide with the ecosystems across and around those political boundaries. His story is one of how civil-society—and not government—actors are critical in attempts to create “territories of choice,” visions of landscapes and communities that are integrated, rather than divided. In key, albeit different, ways, both Y2Y and ISDA have made headway toward this goal. It is to be hoped that the lessons to be drawn from this volume will be usefully extended and applied not only in North America but in other border regions of the world.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,076
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,254

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,023
Communication savante0,0110,018
Science ouverte0,0010,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0760,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,332
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueConservation BiologyMême sujetArchaeology and Natural HistoryTravaux en français237 207