Negotiating Narrative Inquiries: Living in a Tension-Filled Midst
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT The authors explore the place of tension in understanding narrative inquiry as a relational research methodology. Drawing on a narrative inquiry into children's, teachers’, and families’ experiences in schools shaped by achievement testing practices that flow from accountability policies, the authors show how attending to tensions is central to the relational aspects of composing field texts as well as writing interim and final research texts. Through a fictionalized interim research text, the authors make visible the centrality of relational narrative ethics as we live in the midst of tensions. Finally, the authors offer a starting point for considering the dangers of counterstories as we work with participants and attend to tensions. Keywords: narrative inquiryrelational ethicstensionsstandardized assessment Notes 1. A Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada funded research project: “A Narrative Inquiry into Children's and Teachers’ Curriculum Making Experiences in an Achievement Testing Era” held by D. Jean Clandinin, Janice Huber, M. Shaun Murphy, and Anne Murray Orr. 2. Beginning in the 2006–2007 school year, for approximately 2 days per week for 1 full school year, Anne Murray Orr and graduate student Jennifer Tinkham participated alongside a teacher, children, and families in a Grade-4 classroom in a small town school in eastern Canada. Jean Clandinin and graduate students Jennifer Mitton and Simmee Chung participated alongside a teacher, Song Lee, children, and families in a Grade-3 classroom in a suburban school in a western Canadian city. Beginning in the 2007–2008 school year, for approximately 2 days per week for 1 school year, Shaun Murphy and graduate student Erin Lawrence participated alongside a teacher, children, and families in a Grade-5 classroom in a school in a community located close to a large urban center in western Canada. Each school context was marked by the significantly diverse lives of children and families. This life diversity was less evident in each school's staff. Our participation in each school context was centrally shaped through relationships with the teachers. During the 2008–2009 school year, Janice Huber engaged in an inquiry alongside a mother and child as they shared with her their experiences of negotiating the child's year in kindergarten. 3. Because of the multiage organization of Ravine Elementary School, a former research site, we refer to the children's year in school rather than grade. Year 6 refers to children 11 years of age. 4. We borrowed the idea of narrative coherence from CitationCarr (1986) who wrote, “coherence seems to be a need imposed on us whether we seek it or not…what we are doing is telling and retelling, to ourselves and to others, the story of what we are about and what we are” (p. 97).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle