First Report of a Carlavirus in <i>Fuchsia</i> spp. in New Zealand
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The genus Fuchsia has 110 known species and numerous hybrids. These ornamental plants with brightly colored flowers originate from Central and South America, New Zealand, and Tahiti, but a wider variety are now grown all over the world. Few viruses have been reported in Fuchsia spp.: a carlavirus, Fuchsia latent virus (FLV) (1-3), a cucumovirus, Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) (3), and two tospoviruses, Impatiens necrotic spot virus (INSV) and Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) (4). In August 2009, five plants, each representing a different cultivar of Fuchsia hybrid, from home gardens in the Auckland and Southland regions of New Zealand, displayed variable symptoms including mild chlorosis, mild mottle, or purple spots on leaves. Plants tested negative for CMV, INSV, and TSWV using commercial ImmunoStrips (Agdia Inc., Elkhart, IN); however, flexuous particles of ~650 to 700 nm were found by electron microscopy in all samples. Local lesions were also observed on Chenopodium quinoa plants 4 weeks after sap inoculation. Total RNA was extracted from all plants with a RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Doncaster, Australia) and tested by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR using two generic sets of primers (R. van der Vlugt, personal communication) designed to amplify fragments of ~730 and 550 bp of the replicase and coat protein genes of carlaviruses, respectively. Amplicons of the expected size were obtained for all samples, cloned, and at least three clones per sample were sequenced. No differences within clones from the same samples were observed (GenBank Accession Nos. HQ197672 to HQ197681). A BLASTn search of the viral replicase fragment showed the highest nucleotide identity (76%) to Potato rough dwarf virus (PRDV) (EU020009), whereas the coat protein fragment had maximum nucleotide identity (70 to 72%) to PRDV (EU020009 and DQ640311) and Potato virus P (DQ516055). Sequences obtained were also pairwise aligned using the MegAlign program (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI) and results showed that the isolates had 83 to 97% identity to each other within each genome region. Further sequences (HQ197925 and HQ197926) were obtained from a Fuchsia plant originating from Belgium, a BLASTn analysis showed high nucleotide identity (84 to 99%) to the New Zealand isolates. The low genetic identity to other Carlavirus members suggests that these isolates belong to a different species from those previously sequenced. On the basis of electron microscopy and herbaceous indexing, the isolates had similar characteristics to a carlavirus reported from Fuchsia in Italy (1) and FLV reported in Canada (2). The Italian carlavirus isolate was obtained and tested with the same primers by RT-PCR. Pairwise analysis of the Italian sequences (HQ197927 and HQ197928) with the New Zealand and Belgian sequences showed between 84 and 95% similarity within each genome region. These results suggest that the carlavirus infecting these plants is the same virus, possibly FLV. To our knowledge, this is the first report of this carlavirus infecting Fuchsia spp. in New Zealand, but the virus has probably been present for some time in this country and is likely to be distributed worldwide. References: (1) G. Dellavalle et al. Acta Hortic. 432:332, 1996. (2) L. J. John et al. Acta Hortic. 110:195, 1980. (3) P. Roggero et al. Plant Pathol. 49:802, 2000. (4) R. Wick and B. Dicklow. Diseases in Fuchsia. Common Names of Plant Diseases. Online publication. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, 1999.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».