MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2097745119 · doi:10.7202/019751ar

Introduction. Natural Science in the New World

2008· article· en· W2097745119 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Victoria Dickenson, Elsbeth Heaman

Notice bibliographique

RevueScientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityMcCord Museum
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNatural (archaeology)Natural scienceGeographyPhilosophyArchaeologyEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

For much of Canadian history, most of the science that took place in Canada took place within the bounds of natural history, and it was primarily the study of natural history that inserted Canada into the consciousness of Europe.Long before science was institutionalized in Canada, early naturalist-explorers scoured the landscape, studying minerals, plants and animals, as well as human artifacts, in quest of commercial, scientific, or military uses.Stories and samples of diamonds, gold, copper, and other metals, or the 'vegetable gold' of ginseng or even mast trees, provoked royal and commercial support for further voyages of exploration and conquest.Back in the metropolis, whether Paris, London, or Madrid, disputes over the exact nature of these mineral or botanical specimens reflected the controversies between alchemists, doctors, herbalists and natural philosophers, and revealed the fault lines of the scientific revolution.The minerals, plants, animal skins and parts, curiosities, even live specimens, including those unfortunate Aboriginals imported to European courts in the early years of exploration, provoked debate and controversy in Europe not only about the nature of the New World, but also about how the natural world was known.Linnaeus, in a famous aphorism ('America, 1492'), asserted the significance of the discovery of the New World that, in essence, made everything new, and it was the flood of new specimens and new observations that forced European naturalists to revise their speculations on the classification of nature.The newly emergent discipline of natural history was, according to Victoria Dickenson et Elsbeth Heaman Paula Findlen, "perhaps the most widely discussed and hotly debated discipline among Renaissance natural philosophers." 1 Thus, the discovery of Canada and the development of natural history occurred simultaneously, and the two reinforced one another.The descriptions and objects brought back from Canada by the Corte-Real brothers, by Jacques Cartier and his chronicler André Thevet, among others, helped to fuel the renewed investigations into the natural world that so characterized sixteenth-century European scholarship.Scholars and naturalists developed rigorous new techniques for describing and classifying nature, at the same time that they also developed networks of commercial exchange that further encouraged the search for natural specimens.The greater attention to natural objects themselves, the new illustrations of those objects, and the extended networks of scholarly exchange, were the factors that better enabled explorers and settlers in Canada to undertake observations.A Jesuit missionary in China, Pierre Jartoux, had recently provided a detailed and illustrated account of ginseng, which he noted was highly sought-after as a remedy.The Jesuit Joseph-François Lafitau, had not been very long in Canada before he recruited Aboriginal informants to help him locate ginseng in the New World, and his 1718 treatise on North American ginseng initiated a lucrative trade to China. 2 Though the two plants were not identical, Lafitau believed that they were, since they resembled each other and both Chinese and Iroquois peoples used the plants for healing.By the seventeenth century, a number of Canadian plant specimens, transplanted to European botanical gardens or preserved in collections, were already well known to European experts.Canadian flora became increasingly represented both in exhaustive international surveys and in local regional studies.A series of Canadian plants was included in an ambitious encyclopedic index of more than six thousand plants described by Caspar Bauhin and published in 1623.Twelve years later, Jacques Philippe Cornut, a physician, published Historia Plantarum Canadensium, which described eighty-six plants (only some of them Canadian), that he had studied at the herb garden of the Paris Faculty of Medicine.Many were illustrated with copper plate engravings.3 In the 1690s, the French state commissioned a French physician stationed in Quebec, Michel

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,997
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,153

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0460,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueScientia Canadensis Canadian Journal of the History of Science Technology and Medicine→Même sujetHistory of Science and Medicine→Travaux en français237 207→