MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2098745495 · doi:10.1002/prot.10160

Crystal structure of <i>Escherichia coli</i> EC1530, a glyoxylate induced protein YgbM

2002· article· en· W2098745495 sur OpenAlexaff
Youngchang Kim, T. Skarina, Steven Beasley, Roman A. Laskowski, C.H. Arrowsmith, A. Joachimiak, A.M. Edwards, Alexei Savchenko

Notice bibliographique

RevueProteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueEnzyme Structure and Function
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
Mots-clésTriosephosphate isomeraseEscherichia coliCrystallographyChemistryBiochemistryBiologyStereochemistryGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The crystal structure of YgbM (EC1530) (Fig. 1), a glyoxylate induced protein from Escherichia coli, has been determined and refined to 1.63 Å by multiple-wavelength anomalous dispersion (MAD) method. YgbM is encoded by DNA bases 2862259–2863035 and belongs to a protein family of Pfam-B_7694.1 The gene is clustered with MutS (DNA mismatch repair protein), serine/threonine protein phosphatase, glycerol-3-phosphate regulon repressor, 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase, l-fuculose phosphate aldolase, gluconate permease, Rpos (RNA polymerase sigma factor), Nlpd (lipoprotein Nlpd), Pcm (protein-l-isoaspartate o-methyltransferase), SurE (stationary phase survival protein). A: Protein sequences are compared between different species. B: The ribbon drawing shows the TIM structure of EC1530. α-helices, outside of the barrel, are shown in red, β-strands, inside of the barrel in cyan, and one of two Mg2+ (the major site) in the barrel is shown in green. The Mg2+ in the minor site located on the outside surface is not shown. C: The secondary elements were indicated above the one-letter amino acid codes of E. coli ygbM. Residues interacting with Mg2+ are also indicated in red dots. The Se-Met derivative of YgbM crystallized in the C2 space group with unit cell dimensions of a = 104.907 Å, b = 74.368 Å, c = 39.376 Å, β = 98.81°. There is one 258-residue protein per asymmetric unit. This structure adopts the common TIM (triosephosphate isomerase) barrel (β/α)8, in which an eight-membered cylindrical β-sheet is surrounded by eight helices.2 Similar to other TIM barrel structures, all of the turns between the α-helices and the subsequent β-strands at the N-terminal end of the barrel are composed of only three or four residues, whereas the corresponding loops at the C-terminal end are longer and form a part of the potential active site. Inside of the TIM barrel, several hydrophilic side-chains from the C-terminal loops as well as two well-ordered water molecules coordinate to a Mg2+, presumably forming an active site (Fig. 2). As expected, a Dali search3 found several structures with relatively high similarity, which include 4XIS, 1A0C-A, 1QUM-A, 1DE5, and 1BYB with Z scores higher than 10. Further biochemical and structural analyses are in progress. Putative catalytic site including Mg2+ (major site) is shown. The Mg2+ is coordinated to an ordered water molecule, a formate, two glutamate, a glutamine, aspartate residues forming a square-bi-pyramid conformation. Protein Cloning Expression and Purification. The ORF of ygbM was amplified by PCR from E. coli genomic DNA (ATCC). The gene was cloned into the NdeI and BamHI sites of a modified pET15b cloning vector (Novagen) in which the TEV protease cleavage site replaced the thrombin cleavage site and a double-stop codon was introduced downstream from the BamHI site. This construct provides for an N-terminal hexa-histidine tag separated from the gene by a TEV protease recognition site (ENLYFQ↓G). The fusion protein was overexpressed in E. coli BL21-Gold (DE3) (Stratagene) harboring an extra plasmid encoding three rare tRNAs (AGG and AGA for Arg, ATA for Ile). The cells were grown in LB at 37°C to an OD600 of approximately 0.6 and protein expression induced with 0.4 mM IPTG. After induction, the cells were incubated overnight with shaking at 15°C. The harvested cells were resuspended in binding buffer (500 mM NaCl, 5% Glycerol, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 5 mM imidazole), flash-frozen in liquid N2, and stored at −70°C. The thawed cells were lysed by sonication after the addition of 0.5% NP-40 and 1 mM each of PMSF and benzamidine. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation (27000g for 30 min) and passed through a DE52 column preequilibrated in binding buffer. The flow-through fraction was then applied to a metal chelate affinity column charged with Ni2+. The hexa-histidine tag was eluted from the column in elution buffer (500 mM NaCl, 5% Glycerol, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 500 mM imidazole), and the tag then cleaved from the protein by treatment with recombinant His-tagged TEV protease. The cleaved protein was then resolved from the cleaved His-tag and the His-tagged protease by flowing the mixture through a second Ni2+-column. The YgbM protein was dialyzed in 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, and concentrated by using a BioMax concentrator (Millipore). Before crystallization, any particulate matter was removed from the sample by passing through a 0.2-μm Ultrafree-MC centrifugal filter (Millipore). For the preparation of selenomethionine (SeMet) enriched protein, the E. coli YgbM was expressed in the methionine auxotroph strain B834(DE3) of E. coli (Novagen) and purified under the same conditions as the native protein in supplemented M9 media. The reducing reagent β-mercaptoethanol (5 mM) was added to all purification buffers. The protein was crystallized by vapor diffusion in hanging drops by mixing 2 μL of the protein solution (9 mg/mL) with 2 μL of 0.1 M HEPES, pH 7, 5% PEG 8000 and 5% glycerol, and equilibrated at 20°C over 100 μL of this solution. Crystals, which appeared after 3 days, were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen with crystallization buffer plus 20% glycerol as cryoprotectant before data collection. Diffraction data were collected at 100 K at the 19ID beamline of the Structural Biology Center at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. The three-wavelength inverse-beam MAD data up to 1.63 Å [peak: 12.6620 KeV (0.97946 Å), inflection point: 12.6603 KeV (0.97957 Å), high-energy remote: 13.1000 KeV (0.93927 Å)] were collected from a Se-Met labeled protein crystal. One crystal (0.2 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm) was used to collect at 100 K all data MAD sets to 1.63 Å with 3 s exposure/1°/frame using 150 mm crystal to detector distance. The total oscillation range was 170 degrees as predicted with use of strategy module within HKL2000 suite.4 The space group was C2 with cell dimension of a = 104.907, b = 74.368, c = 39.376, β = 98.81°. All data were processed and scaled with HKL2000 (Table I)to an Rmerge of 7.2%, 7.0%, and 8.0% for inflection point, peak, and remote, respectively. The structure was determined by MAD phasing5 using CNS6 and refined to 1.63 Å by using CNS against the averaged peak data. The initial model was built automatically by using ARP/wARP.7 The model was further refined to 1.63 Å. Throughout the model was manually adjusted by using O.8 The final R was 0.194 and the free R of 0.214 with all data (Table 2). Electron density calculated at 1.5 σ is well connected for all the main-chains and most of the side-chains except a few areas on the surface of the molecules. The stereochemistry of the structure was checked with PROCHECK9 and the Ramachandran plot. The main-chain torsion angles for all residues are in allowed regions. We thank all members of the Structural Biology Center at Argonne National Laboratory for their help in conducting experiments and Lindy Keller for help in preparation of this manuscript.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,197
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsMême sujetEnzyme Structure and FunctionTravaux en français237 207