Sturgeons (Chondrostei: Acipenseridae) and their metazoan parasites: patterns and processes in historical biogeography
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract AimThe historical biogeography of host‐parasite associations is examined in a geologically old group of fishes, the sturgeons (Osteichthyes: Acipenseridae), and their parasite assemblage. Evidence from phylogenetics and biogeographical studies of several parasite groups is used to formulate and evaluate hypotheses about the coevolutionary history of this host‐parasite association and, ultimately, the origin of sturgeons. LocationThe geographical areas discussed in this study are the temperate regions of North America and Eurasia, including the North Atlantic, North Pacific, Mediterranean and Ponto‐Caspian basins and their drainages. MethodsRelationships of parasites in several clades (Truttaedacnitis, Diclybothriidae, Deropristiidae,Spinitectusand Acrobothriidae) are analysed or re‐analysed using cladistics. These results are combined with hypotheses of relationships of sturgeons and their biogeography. We largely follow an ‘empirical synthetic pattern approach' (Grande & Bemis, 1998) where the search is primarily for broadly congruent patterns, keeping interpretations close to the data and to known or postulated Earth history (palaeogeography). The evidence from the cladistic analyses is first interpreted within the context of vicariance events, but dispersalist scenarios are also discussed where warranted. We also use the concept of Croizat's ‘biogeographical tracks' to characterize broadly congruent distributional patterns. ResultsPhylogenetic hypotheses and biogeography of parasites indicate three major biogeographical tracks, of which a Holarctic track involving northern and north‐eastern Asian regions and North America is predominant (inCrepidostomum auriculatum, Polypodium hydriforme, Truttaedacnitis, Capillospirura, Diclybothriidae,Amphilina), with evidence for a recurring basaltrans‐Pacific track (inTruttaedacnitis, Diclybothriidae). Trans‐Atlantic tracks appear to be either independent of (in Deropristidae) or secondarily derived from (inBothrimonusandTruttaedacnitis sphaerocephala) a Holarctic track. Evidence from parasites supports the hypothesis of sister relationships betweenAcipenser medirostrisandA. mikadoi, and betweenA. fulvescensandA. brevirostrum. Main conclusionsThis host–parasite association was historically structured by colonization and subsequent coevolution. Dispersal and vicariance of acipenserids resulted in small but widespread, highly distinct, monophyletic parasite lineages. Species of such parasite clades remain associated with major and often discrete continental and oceanic formations, and occasionally with related sturgeon species. Biogeographical tracks implicate the Cretaceous and early Tertiary Asian–American peninsula (Beringian region) as a historically important region in the origin and early geodispersion of the parasite fauna. This is consistent with hypotheses of the northern north‐eastern Asian region, or the more inclusive Asian–American peninsula, as a key area in the early diversification of sturgeons and the acquisition of their parasite fauna. The parasite fauna supports the hypothesis of a former continuous distribution of Nearctic and eastern Palaearctic (Siberian) sturgeons that was subsequently fragmented by geological and climatic events, resulting in major displacement of ancestral sturgeon populations in North America. The parasites also reflect a historical connection with marine and brackish water environments that pre‐dates the diversification of sturgeons, indicating that ancestral acipenserids were diadromous.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».