MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2100096051 · doi:10.1093/forestry/cpn046

Complex stand structures and associated dynamics: measurement indices and modelling approaches

2008· article· en· W2100096051 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Peter F. Newton

Notice bibliographique

RevueForestry An International Journal of Forest Research · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueForest ecology and management
Établissements canadiensCanadian Forest Service
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDynamics (music)Computer scienceStatistical physicsPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Complex forest stands arising from paradigm shifts in forest management practices (e.g. variable retention silvicultural systems, natural disturbance pattern emulation, systematic/selection mechanized thinning treatments) represent an increasing proportion of the productive forest land base throughout many of the world's forested ecosystems. Characterized by structural heterogeneity (e.g. multimodal diameter, height and age distributions with aggregated and segregated spatial patterns), complex stands are intrinsically difficult to measure and model, particularly in terms of their structural attributes (e.g. size distributions and spatial patterns) and temporal dynamics (e.g. survivor growth, ingress (regeneration), mortality, succession vectors and spatial dynamics). In response to this analytical challenge, discussions were initiated with various members of the regional (Ontario Forest Research Institute), national (Canadian Forest Service) and international (Units 4.01.02 (Growth models for tree and stand simulation), 4.01.00 (Forest mensuration and modelling), 4.01.03 (Instruments and methods in forest mensuration) and 1.05.00 (Uneven-aged Silviculture) of the International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO)) forest science and management communities. The resultant consensus derived from these discussions was the need to benchmark the current state of knowledge, share successes and compare various measurement and modelling approaches via an international scientific conference. Consequently, the conference, entitled ‘Complex Stand Structures and Associated Dynamics: Measurement Indices and Modeling Approaches’, was held in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada, over the July 29th–August 2nd, 2007 period. The conference program consisted of six plenary sessions, concurrent poster sessions and a field tour day in which some of the complex stand structures common to the Great Lakes—St Lawrence Forest Region of central Canada were visited. The plenary sessions consisted of a state-of-the-art overview of the session theme by an invited keynote speaker followed by a series of volunteer oral presentations. Specifically, the sessions were entitled Overview of Complex Stand Structures, Dynamics of Complex Stand Structures, Measuring Complexity I, Measuring Complexity II, Modeling Complexity and Managing Complex Stand Structures: Economic Consequences, Operational Challenges and Decision-support Tools. In total, approximately 100 participants representing 15 countries attended. This mini-Special Issue of Forestry augments the Popular Summaries presented previously by Newton and LeMay (2007) by highlighting a subset of the submitted conference papers. Ignacio Barbeito and co-authors examine the effect of stand structure on regeneration dynamics within simple and complex Stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) stand-types situated in the Northern Plateau of Spain. Conceptually, they link the results of a series of spatial pattern analyses with species-specific ecological characteristics to explain regeneration processes and patterns. The results from univariate and bivariate spatial analyses revealed a facilitative relationship between the overstory and understory populations. This positive relationship was partially explained by the limited seed dispersal distances and localized crown-induced regeneration niches provided by the overstory trees. Operationally, the results suggest that implementing uneven-aged management strategies in order to generate complex multi-aged structures would increase regeneration success within Stone pine stand types. In conclusion, the delineation of the principal environmental determinates underlying spatial pattern formation as demonstrated in this study represents an analytical advancement and framework for further work in spatial analyses. Shawn X. Meng and co-authors presents an innovative site-dependent dynamic species composition model for describing the temporal change in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) composition within boreal mixedwood stands. Parameterization involved an indepth evaluation of a suite of covariance structures in association with a non-linear mixed model approach. The results clearly demonstrated the importance of including site quality within the model specification when describing succession change. The impressive ability of the resultant model to precisely describe the temporal pattern of species composition change suggests that the proposed model would be of utility when developing species-specific growth and yield projection systems for boreal mixedwoods. Hubert Sterba introduces a new application of species and diversity indices based on angle count sampling data for characterizing complex Spruce (Picea)—Fir (Abies)—Beech (Fagus) stand types situated in the Austrian Alps. The indices include spatially inexplicit (Shannon index, coefficient of variation, Gini coefficient, skewness coefficient) and explicit (Pielou's segregation index, Clark and Evans index and differentiation index) measures. Application of the indices to a large 750-ha forest management district revealed that the indices could be successfully used to discriminate among the various complex stand-type variants. These results suggest that the indices may have wider applicability in forest inventory and silvicultural decision-making including differentiating and detecting management transitions between even-aged and individual tree-selection systems. Yuqing Yang and co-authors develop site-dependent dynamic stocking models for white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss), lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. var latifolia Engelm.) and black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.). The employment of spatially explicit permanent sample plot measurements combined with the difference equation technique and direct error modelling represents an innovative analytical approach which may have wider utility. The authors also demonstrate the utility of the models in deriving stocking indices and examining inter-specific competition relationships. Operationally, the incorporation of the resultant stocking models within growth and yield projection systems will play an important part in quantifying the linkage between reforestation success and long-term stand performance. Collectively, these papers and the others presented at the conference illustrate some of the quantitative challenges faced by the forest science and management communities in the measurement, modelling and management of complex stand types. The plausible solutions and innovative approaches offered by the authors should provide the foundation for future advances in this area.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,039

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,172
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,156 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueForestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchMême sujetForest ecology and managementTravaux en français237 207