Highly active antiretroviral therapy and socioeconomic inequalities in AIDS mortality in Spain
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sir In a recent paper, Borrell et al.1 document the change in AIDS mortality following the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in Spain. Because access to HAART is free under Spain's National Health Service, the authors hypothesized that the introduction of HAART would narrow existing socioeconomic (SES) inequalities in AIDS mortality. They compare the ratio of age-adjusted mortality rates among lower and higher socioeconomic groups over time and, based on the increases in the ratio over time among men and women, conclude that ‘SES group related inequalities in AIDS mortality did not narrow after the introduction of HAART’1 (p. 607). However, judgments about the magnitude of health inequalities often depend on the scale upon which they are measured, especially over time.2–4 And it is obvious from their Figures 1 and 2 that if one uses the arithmetic difference in mortality rates, rather than the ratio, SES inequalities have indeed narrowed, and by a large amount. Moreover, the spectacular decline in mortality among low-educated individuals living in deprived neighbourhoods suggests that these individuals have, in fact, benefited most from the introduction of HAART. This is consistent with other evidence suggesting that sicker populations (i.e. those most in need of treatment) derive greater benefits from HAART.5 To be fair, Borrell et al. do not completely ignore absolute changes, noting that ‘it has to be mentioned that absolute differences are higher in 1995 than in the other years, mainly due to the higher rates’1 (pp. 603–604). But it is unclear why they do not consider absolute SES mortality differences as inequalities, and they do not provide any justification for why we should privilege the relative over the absolute perspective. Given that most countries now have some public health policy focus on reducing health inequalities, it remains important to measure and monitor health inequality trends, especially in response to medical innovations such as HAART. Thus, the analysis by Borrell et al. is most welcome and we would generally agree with their conclusion that current SES inequalities in AIDS mortality in Spain are likely to be driven by some combination of lower access and adherence to treatment (including HAART), cormorbid conditions, and material factors. Thus an absolute perspective on inequalities may not, in this case, result in substantially different strategies for further reducing inequalities in AIDS mortality in Spain. But taking an absolute perspective does suggest that HAART has been extremely important in narrowing socioeconomic differences in AIDS mortality in Spain. Sam Harper John Lynch Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».