Mely Caballero-Anthony and Alistair D. B. Cook, eds. Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Issues, Challenges and Framework for Action. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2013, xvi+349p.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Non-Traditional Security in Asia: Issues, Challenges and Framework for Action Mely Caballero-Anthony and Alistair D. B. Cook, eds. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2013, xvi+349p.Virtually anything that constitutes a threat to a person can be indexed as a human security issue. This makes it sometimes difficult to determine what should be included and what, if anything at all, should be excluded from definition. Within human security, however, we can easily distinguish two groups of threats: state-sponsored military and non-military. Anything that is technically is commonly regarded as a non-traditional security (NTS) issue, be it local or transnational in nature. Some examples are spread of infectious diseases, natural disasters, resource scarcity, transborder pollution and environmental degradation, irregular migration, transnational crime, but also threats such as state sponsored violence on domestic populations and emergence of non-state armed actors.The worldwide discourse on non-traditional security gravitates around three major schools, as editors point out in introductory chapter (Chapter 1) of this book: 1994 UNDP Report school; Japanese school; and Canadian-Norwegian school. As scope of book is not analysis of such schools but description of some case-studies, general approach of all three is simplified as being management of non-military threats to safety of societies, groups and individuals (p. 5). One thing is, however, made very clear: since many of such security challenges are transnational, securitizing actors tend to draw closer, turning to regional and multi-level frameworks that have profound implications for regional security cooperation among states, particularly in Asia.The editors then go on to introduce five pillars of securitization analysis, as defined by scholars at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies: issue area (the nature of threat); securitizing actors; security concept (the securitized target); process (the speech act); and intervening variables (interplay of different concepts, issue linkage, role of stakeholders, and domestic political systems). Once these questions are addressed, ultimate goal is evaluation and analysis of policies and governance, or the process of decision-making and process through which decisions are (or are not) implemented (p. 8). This inevitably results in an increased interaction between state and non-state securitizing actors, a process that gives rise to multifaceted governance structures with competing or joint mandates, such as Association of Southeast Asian Nations, United Nations bodies, Bali Democracy Forum, and so forth.Analyzing, evaluating, and eventually fine-tuning these governance structures are sine qua non of success. Eight indicators are identified to measure governance performance: participation; rule of law; transparency; responsiveness; consensus-oriented decisions; equity and inclusiveness; effectiveness and efficiency; and accountability. These are perspectives through which this book undertakes an investigation into nine key non-traditional security threats in Asia.Health is first NTS threat to be addressed (Chapter 2). Infectious and parasitic diseases linked to poor nutrition and an unsafe environment are major causes of death in developing countries, and Southeast Asia in particular has a wonyingly high incidence. The chapter not only provides a comprehensive overview of frameworks and characteristics of health systems in region; it also analyzes health discourse in Asia by delineating its transnational features ( epidemics often go beyond borders). Of particular relevance is explanation of pandemic preparedness and regional cooperative schemes developed after outbreak of human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».