MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2102308746 · doi:10.1044/sasd14.3.13

End-of-Life Decision Making, Quality of Life, Enteral Feeding, and the Speech-Language Pathologist

2005· article· en· W2102308746 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Elizabeth Hanna, Aviva Joel

Notice bibliographique

RevuePerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia) · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueDysphagia Assessment and Management
Établissements canadiensBridgepoint Active Healthcare
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineEnteral administrationIntensive care medicineQuality of life (healthcare)Speech-Language PathologyPathologyParenteral nutritionPhysical therapyNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

No AccessPerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)Article1 Oct 2005End-of-Life Decision Making, Quality of Life, Enteral Feeding, and the Speech-Language Pathologist Elizabeth Hanna and Aviva Joel Elizabeth Hanna Bridgepoint Hospital Toronto, Canada Google Scholar and Aviva Joel Bridgepoint Hospital Toronto, Canada Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/sasd14.3.13 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References American Gastroenterological Association. (1995). American Gastroenterological Association Medical position statement: Guidelines for the use of enteral nutrition.Gastroenterology, 108, 1280–1281. Google Scholar Andrews, M. R., & Levine, A. M. (1989). Dehydration in the terminal patient: Perception of hospice nurses.American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Care, 6, 31–34. Google Scholar Ashby, M., & Mendelson, D. (2004). Gardner; re BWV: Victorian Supreme Court makes landmark Australian ruling on tube feeding.Medical Journal of Australia, 181, 442–445. Google Scholar Ashby, M., & Stoffell, B. (1995). Artificial hydration and alimentation at the end of life: A reply to Craig.Journal of Medical Ethics, 21, 135–140. Google Scholar Bastow, M. D. (1986). Complication of enteral nutrition.Gut, 27 (Suppl. 1), 51–55. Google Scholar Blackhall, L. J.,Frank, G.,Murphy, S. T.,Michel, V.,Palmer, J. M., & Azen, S. P. (1999). Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technology.Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1779–1789. Google Scholar Bowman, K. W., & Hui, E. C. (2000). Bioethics for clinicians: 20. Chinese bioethics.Canadian Medical Association Journal, 163, 1481–1485. Google Scholar Brody, H.,Campbell, M. L.,Faber-Langendoen, K., & Ogle, K. S. (1997). Withdrawing intensive lifesustaining treatment—Recommendations for compassionate clinical management.New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 652–657 Google Scholar Callahan, C. M.,Haag, K. M.,Buchanan, N. N., & Nisi, R. (1999). Decisionmaking for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older adults in a community setting.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47, 1105–1109. Google Scholar Cantor, M. D., & Pearlman, R. A. (2003). Advance care planning in longterm care facilities.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 4, 101–108. Google Scholar Caralis, P. V.,Davis, B.,Wright, K., & Marcial, E. (1993). The influence of ethnicity and race on attitudes toward advance directives, life-prolonging treatments, and euthanasia.Journal of Clinical Ethics, 4, 155–165. Google Scholar Chouinard, J.,Lavigne, E., & Villeneuve, C. (1998). Weight loss, dysphagia, and outcome in advanced dementia.Dysphagia, 13, 151–155. Google Scholar Ciocon, J. O. (1990). Indications for tube feedings in elderly patients.Dysphagia, 5,1–5. Google Scholar Ciocon, J. O.,Silverstone, F. A.,Graver, L. M., & Foley, C. J. (1988). Tube feedings in elderly patients. Indications, benefits, and complications.Archives of Internal Medicine, 19, 17–22. Google Scholar Covinsky, K. E.,Fuller, J. D.,Yaffe, K.,Johnston, C. B.,Hamel, M. B.,Lynn, J.,et al.(2000). Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: Findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48 (5 Suppl.), S187–S193. Google Scholar Critchlow, J., & Bauer-Wu, S. M. (2002). Dehydration in terminally ill patients: Perceptions of long-term care nurses.Journal of Geronto-logical Nursing, 28, 31–39. Google Scholar Cummins, C.,Marshall, T., & Burls, A.(Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham). (1999). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): Feeding in the enteral nutrition of dysphagic stroke patients. Google Scholar Finucane, T. E., & Bynum, J. P. (1996). Use of tube feeding to prevent aspiration pneumonia.Lancet, 348, 1421–1424. Google Scholar Finucane, T. E.,Christmas, C., & Travis, K. (1999). Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: A review of the evidence.Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1365–1370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Gramelspacher, G. P.,Zhou, X. H.,Hanna, M. P., & Tierney, W. M. (1997). Preferences of physicians and their patients for end-of-life care.Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12, 346–351. Google Scholar Hoefler, J. M. (2000). Making decisions about tube feeding for severely demented patients at the end of life: Clinical, legal, and ethical considerations.Death Studies, 24, 233-254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Hopp, F. P., & Duffy, S. A. (2000). Racial variations in end-of-life care.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48, 658–663. Google Scholar Kapp, M. B. (2002). Regulating the foregoing of artificial nutrition and hydration: First, do some harm. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 586–588. Google Scholar Langmore, S. E.,Skarupski, K. A.,Park, P. S., & Fries, B. E. (2002). Predictors of aspiration pneumonia in nursing home residents.Dysphagia, 17, 298–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Langmore, S. E.,Terpenning, M. S.,Schork, A.,Chen, Y.,Murray, J. T.,Lopatin, D., et al. (1998). Predictors of aspiration pneumonia: How important is dysphagia? .Dysphagia, 13, 69–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Lennard-Jones, J. E. (1999). Giving or withholding fluid and nutrients: Ethical and legal aspects.The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, Sept-Oct 33, 482. Google Scholar McCann, R. M.,Hall, W. J., & Groth-Juncker, A. (1994). Comfort care for terminally ill patients. The appropriate use of nutrition and hydration.Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 1263–1266. Google Scholar McClave, S. A., DeMeo, M. T., DeLegge, M. H., DiSario, J. A.,Heyland, D.K., Maloney, J. P., et al. (2002). North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill Patient: Consensus statement.Jpen: Journal of Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition, ( 26 (6 Suppl.), S80–S85. Google Scholar Mitchell, S. L.,Berkowitz, R. E.,Lawson, F. M., & Lipsitz, L. A. (2000). A cross-national survey of tube-feeding decisions in cognitively impaired older persons.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48,391–397. Google Scholar Mitchell, S. L.,Kiely, D. K., & Lipsitz, L. A. (1998). Does artificial enteral nutrition prolong the survival of institutionalized elders with chewing and swallowing problems?.Journals of Gerontology Series A-Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 53,M207–M213. Google Scholar O’Brien, L. A.,Grisso, J. A.,Maislin, G., LaPann, K.,Krotki, K. P.,Greco, P.J., et al. (1995). Nursing home residents’ preferences for life-sustaining treatments.Journal of the American Medical Association, 274, 1775–1779. Google Scholar O’Brien, L. A.,Siegert, E. A.,Grisso, J. A.,Maislin, G. M., LaPann, K.,Evans, L. K., et al. (1997). Tube feeding preferences among nursing home residents.Journal of General Internal Medicine, 12, 364–371. Google Scholar Phillips, P. A.,Rolls, B. J.,Ledingham, J.G., Forsling, M. L.,Morton, J. J.,Crowe, M. J., et al. (1984). Reduced thirst after water deprivation in healthy elderly men.New England Journal of Medicine, 311, 753–759. Google Scholar Pick, N., McDonald, A.,Bennett, N.,Litsche, M.,Dietsche, L.,Leger-wood, R., et al. (1996). Pulmonary aspiration in a long-term care setting: Clinical and laboratory observations and an analysis of risk factors.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44, 763–768. Google Scholar Printz, L. A. (1992). Terminal dehydration, a compassionate treatment.Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 697–700. Google Scholar Rabeneck, L., McCullough, L. B., & Wray, N. P. (1997). Ethically justified, clinically comprehensive guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Lancet, 349, 496–498. Google Scholar Serradura-Russell, A. (1992). Ethical dilemmas in dysphagia management and the right to a natural death.Dysphagia, 7, 102–105. Google Scholar Somogyi-Zalud, E.,Likourezos, A.,Chichin, E., & Olson, E., (2001). Surrogate decision makers’ attitudes towards tube feeding in the nursing home.Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 32, 101–111. Google Scholar Taylor, M. (1995) Benefits for Dehydration in Terminally Ill Patients.Geriatric Nursing, 16, 271–272. Google Scholar Van Rosendaal, G. M.,Verhoef, M. J., & Kinsella, T. D. (1999). How are decisions made about the use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for long-term nutritional support?.American Journal of Gastroenterology, 94, 3225–3228. Google Scholar Yutang, L.(no date). Zaadz. Retrieved October 2, 2005, fromhttp://zaadz.comquotes/authors/lin_yutang Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByPerspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups6:3 (649-653)25 Jun 2021Facilitating End-of-Life Interaction Between Patients With Severe Communication Impairment and Their FamiliesAdithya Chandregowda, Julie A. G. Stierwalt and Heather M. Clark Volume 14Issue 3October 2005Pages: 13-18 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Oct 1, 2005 Metrics Downloaded 163 times Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2005 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF DownloadLoading ...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,197
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,368 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2005
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePerspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia)Même sujetDysphagia Assessment and ManagementTravaux en français237 207