Implementation of a mechanics based system for estimating the strength of a board using mixed signals of MOE and x-ray images
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The most accurate way of identifying the strength of lumber requires destructive testing which is clearly not useful for production of lumber. An intelligent mechanics-based lumber grading system was developed to provide a better estimation of the strength of a board nondestructively. In this study a mechanics-based system was implemented to estimate the strength of a board, using only one combined feature extracted from MOE (modulus of elasticity) profiles and x-ray images. The x-ray image analysis involved extracting the useful parts of the image and compensating for the effect of vibration. After that, the image was passed through a directional low-pass filter to reduce the noise. Furthermore, the image was resized by interpolation in such a way that the size of the signal was the same as the real size of the board, which is 89[mm] 4900 [mm]. The image was passed through a threshold filter to separate the knots based on the fact that the denser knots produce "high hills" in the x-ray image. Finally, information on all the knots such as geometry and location were detected from the threshold image. The knot size and location were fed to an FEM processor to generate the physical model and the associated stress field. In this study, simulating grain direction by analogy to fluid flow and reorienting the element coordinate system along the flow line direction generated the slope of grain. The stress fields were then fed to a feature-extracting-processor which produced one strength predicting feature. A coefficient of determination of 0.4158 was reached using x-ray images alone. The MOE part of the system uses output of CLT machine which contains top and bottom profiles. Due to lumber curvature, one profile may be higher than the other one. By averaging the two profiles this effect will be compensated. Since the grip length for tension tests was 15% of beginning part and end part of each profile, these parts were discarded. The minimum value of the remaining part was the base for calculating the strength. A coefficient of determination of 0.5805 was achieved using MOE alone. Then, the two MOE and x-ray extracted features were combined to a single feature to estimate the strength of the boards. By applying the described algorithm to a database of more than 1000 boards to estimate the strength, a coefficient of determination of 0.6417 was achieved. The results show a way to improve the accuracy of lumber grading systems using combined signals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».