MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2102912171 · doi:10.4043/21256-ms

Centrifuge Modeling of Glide Block and Out-runner Block Impact on Submarine Pipelines

2011· article· en· W2102912171 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOffshore Technology Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Établissements canadiensMemorial University of NewfoundlandCentre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCentrifugeDragPipeline transportGeotechnical engineeringGeologyBlock (permutation group theory)Submarine pipelineCentrifugal forceShear (geology)SubmarineSeabedMarine engineeringEngineeringMechanicsFlow (mathematics)GeometryMechanical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents the results of a series of physical experiments to quantify the drag force on a submarine pipeline caused by a glide block or an out-runner block impact normal to the pipe axis. The experiments were carried out in a geotechnical centrifuge at C-CORE under submerged conditions at a centrifugal force of 30 times the Earth's gravity (i.e. N = 30) and simulated steady and uniform impact velocities ranging between 0.1 and 1.3 m/s with the soil blocks being approximately 5 m in height in prototype scale. The soil blocks were made of kaolin clay consolidated to have undrained shear strengths ranging between about 4 and 6 kPa. The diameter of the model pipes were 6.35 and 9.5 mm corresponding to about 0.19 and 0.29 m in prototype terms. The shear strain rates, defined as the ratio of impact velocity to pipe diameter, in the centrifuge model are N times higher than that in the prototype. The shear rates simulated ranged from about 10 to 136 reciprocal seconds. The paper presents a method for estimating block impact drag force on submarine pipelines based on the results of the centrifuge experiments. Introduction A submarine pipeline is a system of connected sections of pipe that usually transports crude oil or refined hydrocarbons. The pipe is laid on or buried in the seafloor. It typically ranges from 0.1 m to 1.0 m in diameter. The total length of a pipeline is dictated by the distances between the production platform(s) and the onshore or offshore destination(s) and by the route which poses the least risk in terms of offshore geohazards. Submarine landslides and the associated mass movement can potentially have devastating consequences on seafloor installations such as pipelines, flow lines, well systems, cables, etc. Submarine landslides occur frequently on both passive and active continental margins and slopes, releasing sediment volumes that may travel distances as long as hundreds of kilometres on gentle slopes (0.5 to 3°) over the course of less than an hour to several days [1]. The movement of landslide and the released sediment volumes in general terms are so called ‘density flows’. From the initiation to deposition, density flows undergo complex processes that depend on many factors such as the composition, strength characteristics and properties, terrain topography, etc. Geohazards in an offshore oil and gas perspective can be due to local and/or regional site and soil conditions having the potential to develop into failure events causing loss of life and damage to the environment or field installations. Triggering of these events can be caused by natural geological processes or by man's activities, as outlined in a recent state of-the-art review [2]. Research on understanding the mechanisms behind and the risks posed by submarine slides has intensified in the past decade [e.g. 3, 4-10], mainly because of the increasing number of deep-water petroleum fields that have been discovered and in some cases developed. Production from offshore fields in areas with earlier sliding activity is ongoing in the Norwegian margin, Gulf of Mexico, offshore Brazil, the Caspian Sea and West Africa [11]. Estimating magnitude of the drag forces on pipelines caused by density flow impact is an important design consideration in offshore engineering. For buried pipelines in cohesive soils in slowly moving unstable slopes, the available methods seem to provide more or less similar estimates for the drag force normal to the pipe axis. However, this is not the case for estimates of the drag force parallel to the pipe axis [2]. In cohesive soils, the magnitude of the drag force is a function of the rate at which the soil is sheared during interaction with the pipe. Recent works by Zakeri et al. [1, 12-14] provide a method for estimating drag forces caused by clay-rich debris flow (fully remoulded and fluidized density flow) impacting a pipeline normal to its axis. Later, the work was extended to cover all angles of impact [15].

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,765
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle