Fault/fracture controlled hydrothermal dolomitization and associated diagenesis of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research Article| September 01, 2009 Fault/fracture controlled hydrothermal dolomitization and associated diagenesis of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia Jack Wendte; Jack Wendte Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, jwendte@NRCan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Guoxiang Chi; Guoxiang Chi Department of Geology, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, chiguo@uregina.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Ihsan Al-Aasm; Ihsan Al-Aasm Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, alaasm@uwindsor.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David Sargent David Sargent Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, dsargent@NRCan.gc.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jack Wendte Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, jwendte@NRCan.gc.ca Guoxiang Chi Department of Geology, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, chiguo@uregina.ca Ihsan Al-Aasm Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, alaasm@uwindsor.ca David Sargent Geological Survey of Canada, 3303 – 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2L 2A7, dsargent@NRCan.gc.ca Publisher: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Received: 28 Jan 2009 Accepted: 01 Sep 2009 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2009) 57 (3): 275–322. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.57.3.275 Article history Received: 28 Jan 2009 Accepted: 01 Sep 2009 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Jack Wendte, Guoxiang Chi, Ihsan Al-Aasm, David Sargent; Fault/fracture controlled hydrothermal dolomitization and associated diagenesis of the Upper Devonian Jean Marie Member (Redknife Formation) in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2009;; 57 (3): 275–322. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.57.3.275 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract The Jean Marie in the July Lake area of northeastern British Columbia consists of mainly limestones and partially dolomitized limestones, with variable dolomite content and porosity of dissolutional origin. Pure dolostones occur as metre-thick bodies, at the very top of the Jean Marie in only a few wells. Dolomite also occurs as a selective replacement of internal sediment infilling fractures. This mode of occurrence, as well as the patchy distribution of pure dolostones at the very top of the Jean Marie, suggests that matrix replacement dolomites formed from fluids that were delivered from flow through a vertical, or near-vertical, fault-conduit system, rather than from fluids that were delivered from flow laterally through matrix pores in a stratal-controlled system. Later mineral phases, including (in paragenetic order) saddle dolomite cement, sphalerite, dickite and barite, are also interpreted as part of the fault/fracture controlled system of diagenesis. The homogenization temperatures of saddle dolomite range from 80°C to 163°C and those of sphalerite and barite, collectively, from 55°C to 126°C, with a broad range of calculated salinities for all these phases ranging from approximately 9.0 to 27.0 wt.% NaCl + CaCl2 equivalent. The wide range of salinities for these phases is interpreted to be from the mixing of evaporative brines with less saline formation waters away from the fault/fracture conduits.The δ13C and δ18O values for a combined set of matrix replacement dolomites and saddle dolomites fall along a covariant linear trend, suggesting both phases formed from fluids with similar isotopic compositions. Using the oxygen isotopic composition calculated for fluids from which saddle dolomite formed (+0.7‰ SMOW), crystallization temperatures for matrix replacement dolomites of approximately 80°C to 100°C were calculated from the range of δ18O values. The range of crystallization temperatures for both matrix replacement dolomites and saddle dolomites far exceeds the ambient formation temperature at the time of dolomitization or dolomite cementation, estimated to be no higher than 50°C to 60°C. Thus, the formation of both matrix replacement dolomites and saddle dolomite cements conforms to the standard for inferring a hydrothermal origin. The estimated range of ambient formation temperatures suggests an interval of hydrothermal diagenesis possibly starting as early as latest Devonian and continuing into the early Mississippian, at burial depths no deeper than approximately 900 m.The parent fluids for the hydrothermal phase are interpreted to be residual evaporitic brines. During latest Devonian to early Mississippian time, heated brines flowed up through fault-controlled conduits, bypassing approximately 850 m of overlying shale and basinal limestone, into the Jean Marie Member until the flow was impeded by the overlying impermeable shales of the informal upper member of the Redknife Formation. The brines then moved laterally into permeable limestones with grain-support matrices of the upper transgressive-regressive (T-R) cycle of the Jean Marie. This resulted in the formation of scattered metre-thick dolostones at the top of the Jean Marie, and the partial dolomitization of limestones away from the faults. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».