MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2103921763 · doi:10.1130/b31245.1

Systematic mineralogical diversity in A-type granitic intrusions: Control of magmatic source and geological processes

2015· article· en· W2103921763 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Angeliki Papoutsa, Georgia Pe‐Piper, David J. W. Piper

Notice bibliographique

RevueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaSaint Mary's UniversityDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorGeological Society of America
Mots-clésNova scotiaGeological surveyGeologyLibrary scienceSAINTArchaeologyGeographyOceanographyHistoryPaleontologyArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research Article| March 01, 2016 Systematic mineralogical diversity in A-type granitic intrusions: Control of magmatic source and geological processes Angeliki Papoutsa; Angeliki Papoutsa † 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada †angeliki_papoutsa@hotmail.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Georgia Pe-Piper; Georgia Pe-Piper 2Department of Geology, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3C3, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David J.W. Piper David J.W. Piper 3Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada (Atlantic), Bedford Institute of Oceanography, P.O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Angeliki Papoutsa † 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada Georgia Pe-Piper 2Department of Geology, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3C3, Canada David J.W. Piper 3Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada (Atlantic), Bedford Institute of Oceanography, P.O. Box 1006, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2, Canada †angeliki_papoutsa@hotmail.com Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 01 Dec 2014 Revision Received: 16 Jun 2015 Accepted: 17 Aug 2015 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 © 2015 Geological Society of America GSA Bulletin (2016) 128 (3-4): 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1130/B31245.1 Article history Received: 01 Dec 2014 Revision Received: 16 Jun 2015 Accepted: 17 Aug 2015 First Online: 08 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Angeliki Papoutsa, Georgia Pe-Piper, David J.W. Piper; Systematic mineralogical diversity in A-type granitic intrusions: Control of magmatic source and geological processes. GSA Bulletin 2016;; 128 (3-4): 487–501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/B31245.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract The origin and causes of mineralogical diversity of A-type granites are debated. The series of A-type granite plutons, with distinct mineralogical differences, emplaced along an Upper Paleozoic crustal-scale shear zone in the Cobequid Highlands, Nova Scotia, provide an opportunity to examine the origin of different A-type plutons in a similar tectonic setting. Based on the ferromagnesian minerals present, the plutons are classified into sodic granites with sodic amphibole, calcic granites with calcic amphibole, and biotite granites. Sodic and calcic granites occur exclusively in complex intrusions with subequal amounts of gabbro in the eastern shear zone, whereas plutons in the western shear zone, with lesser gabbro, are solely biotite granites. Trace elements and radiogenic isotopes show that the three granite types have different sources. Intensive parameters including temperature, pressure, and water-in-melt contents were estimated from mineralogical and geochemical data. Modeling of these geochemical data suggests that the biotite and calcic granites were derived by 20%–40% partial melting of intracrustal feldspathic rocks, whereas the sodic granites are extreme fractionates (90%) of coeval mafic magma. We propose that supply of Upper Paleozoic mafic magma, probably related to regional extension and decompression melting beneath the Magdalen Basin, created a deep crustal hot zone in the eastern Cobequid Highlands, and extreme fractionation of underplated mafic sills produced the sodic granites. Heat transfer from crystallizing mafic magma induced partial melting of the surrounding crust, creating batches of biotite and calcic granitic melts in different depths. Fractionated and crustally derived melts segregated along crustal-scale faults, constructing the complex plutons in the east. Melting of the crust was further facilitated by the release of water from the crustal rocks upon heating. In the eastern shear zone, water was released predominantly by magmatic rocks and in lesser amounts compared to the west, where Neoproterozoic sedimentary and volcaniclastic rocks are more abundant. The volatile-rich granitic melts in the western part of the shear zone were crystallized rapidly, stabilizing only biotite. This study demonstrates that the mineralogical variations in A-type granites arise from rather similar magma compositions, but they are important petrogenetic indicators of varying sources, specific magmatic processes, and emplacement conditions. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,110
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,190
Écart entre enseignants0,173 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations56
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGeological Society of America BulletinMême sujetGeological and Geochemical AnalysisTravaux en français237 207