MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2104192469 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00004-2

Global access to surgical care: moving forward

2015· letter· en· W2104192469 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Evan G. Wong, Dan Deckelbaum, Tarek Razek

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Global Health · 2015
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGlobal Health and Surgery
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMEDLINEGlobal healthMedicineComputer scienceIntensive care medicineData scienceNursingPolitical sciencePublic health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Global surgical care is gaining ground on the public health platform. Throughout 2015–16, the World Bank is publishing the long-anticipated third edition of its Disease Control Priorities (DCP3). First published in 1993,1Jamison DT Mosley WH Measham AR Bobadilla JL Disease control priorities in developing countries. Oxford University Press, New York1993Google Scholar these reports aim to systematically identify effective interventions to address the disease burden in low-income and middle-income countries. For the first time since its inception, the DCP now includes a distinct volume on the value of surgical care. Volume 1—Essential Surgery2Debas HT Donkor P Gawande A Jamison DT Kruk ME Mock CN Disease control priorities, 3rd edn: vol 1. Essential surgery. World Bank, Washington, DC2015Google Scholar—focuses on the benefits of surgical care, including its potential to substantially decrease mortality while being exceptionally cost-effective; the issues of access to life-saving surgery, perioperative safety, and the inclusion of surgery in universal health coverage are also specifically addressed. The recognition of surgery as an essential component of global public health stems from a growing body of academic literature detailing the disparities in access to surgical care. Population-based surveys have been instrumental in quantifying the unmet need for surgical care, and hospital-based studies have shed light on deficiencies in human and material resources required for basic surgical care. Global estimates of surgical care and need, arising from complex statistical models, have also been essential in quantifying the problem and have been especially effective in gaining the attention of stakeholders and decision-makers from outside the surgical sphere. In 2008, Weiser and colleagues3Weiser TG Regenbogen SE Thompson KD et al.An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data.Lancet. 2008; 372: 139-144Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1699) Google Scholar estimated that, of the 234 million surgical procedures done annually worldwide, only 3·5% occurred in countries with health expenditures of US$100 or less per capita. Funk and colleagues4Funk LM Weiser TG Berry WR et al.Global operating theatre distribution and pulse oximetry supply: an estimation from reported data.Lancet. 2010; 376: 1055-1061Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (261) Google Scholar estimated that more than 2 billion people worldwide lack access to adequate surgical care. In The Lancet Global Health, Blake Alkire and colleagues5Alkire BC Raykar NP Shrime MG et al.Global access to surgical care: a modelling study.Lancet Glob Health. 2015; 3: e316-e323Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar now provide additional measures to help us gain political priority on the public health agendas. In this study, Alkire and colleagues modelled access to surgery in 180 countries on the basis of four criteria: timeliness, surgical capacity, safety, and affordability. Based on their probability models, 4·8 billion people, or 68% of the world's population, lack access to adequate surgical care. This proportion varied greatly according to income classification, with 99·5% of the population in low-income countries—as opposed to 13·9% in high-income countries—with inadequate access. Besides providing further evidence that deficiencies in access to surgical care remain a major public health concern, this study's methods and findings shed light on important steps forward in improving access to surgery worldwide. Complex statistical models that provide global estimates rely on primary data collection; in other words, estimates from models are only as reliable as their inputs. To move things forward, we must continue to quantify the problem at the grassroots level; measurements of the prevalence of surgical diseases, the availability of resources required for surgical care, and the outcomes of surgical procedures will remain essential components of future studies. However, now that increasing attention is being paid to surgery in public health, we must also capitalise on this opportunity to move beyond descriptive studies. Charles Mock recently issued a call for the academic global surgery community to take major steps forward in the literature.6Mock C Surgical capacity surveys: a call for papers on the next steps for moving beyond descriptive data.World J Surg. 2015; 39: 811-812Crossref PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar Now that a robust body of literature has detailed the need, the time has come to delineate root causes, design effective interventions, and measure processes and outcomes over time. The breakdown of access to surgical care into timeliness, capacity, safety, and affordability could be particularly useful in guiding these future studies. The climate is ripe for major advances in improving access to surgical care worldwide. Surgical trainees are increasingly interested in global health.7Powell AC Casey K Liewehr DJ Hayanga A James TA Cherr GS Results of a national survey of surgical resident interest in international experience, electives, and volunteerism.J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208: 304-312Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (143) Google Scholar The resolution entitled “Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia as a component of universal health coverage” has been unanimously adopted by the World Health Organization's Executive Board.8GIEESCStrengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia as a component of universal health coverage. World Health Organization, Geneva2014Google Scholar The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery has gained momentum and will hopefully provide a unified voice for the community.9Meara JG Leather AJM Hagander L et al.Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development.Lancet. 2015; (published online April 27.)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60160-XGoogle Scholar We must capitalise on these opportunities to finally provide the “neglected stepchild”10Farmer PE Kim JY Surgery and global health: a view from beyond the OR.World J Surg. 2008; 32: 533-536Crossref PubMed Scopus (469) Google Scholar with the attention it deserves. The Centre for Global Surgery is supported by the Grand Challenges Canada Grant (Fall 2014). We declare no competing interests. Global access to surgical care: a modelling studyMost of the world's population does not have access to surgical care, and access is inequitably distributed. The near absence of access in many low-income and middle-income countries represents a crisis, and as the global health community continues to support the advancement of universal health coverage, increasing access to surgical services will play a central role in ensuring health care for all. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,063
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,064
Tête enseignante GPT0,413
Écart entre enseignants0,349 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations12
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Global HealthMême sujetGlobal Health and SurgeryTravaux en français237 207