Results of the 1998-1999 Illinois Waterfowl Hunter Survey
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A total of 3,117 (66%) Illinois waterfowl hunters responded to the 2001-2002 Illinois Waterfowl Hunter Survey.Hunters reported spending 1,337,297 days afield, an increase of 20% from the 1,115,076 days expended during the 2000-2001 license year.The waterfowl harvest decreased 1.7% from 708,092 during 2000-2001 to 695,790 during 2001-2002.Duck harvest estimates were as follows: 305,180 mallards, 61,515 wood ducks, 167,883 other ducks, and 534,578 total ducks.A total of 36,013 teal were harvested during the early (September) teal season.Goose hunters harvested 64,907 Canada geese during the regular Canada goose season. OBJECTIVETo survey waterfowl (duck, goose, and coot) hunters annually to determine their activities, harvest, characteristics, attitudes, and opinions. METHODSA total of 4,729 waterfowl hunters were sampled from the population of Illinois migratory bird hunters registered with the federal Harvest Information Program (HIP).Beginning in March 2002, hunters were mailed an 8-page, self-administered questionnaire and a letter of explanation (Appendices A and B).The questionnaire addressed days afield, harvest, and attitudes toward issues related to the waterfowl seasons, bag limits, and management practices.Hunters received a followup postcard 10 days after the questionnaire, thanking them for returning their survey questionnaire and reminding nonrespondents to return the completed questionnaire.Nonrespondents received a second questionnaire 10 days after the postcard reminder, followed 10 days later with another postcard.We received 3,117 (65.9%) questionnaires from hunters in the sample, of which 2,776 (89.1%) hunted waterfowl in Illinois in 2001-2002.Estimates of number of hunters, days afield, and waterfowl harvested were computed following the procedures outlined by Anderson et al. (1998).Coded data were entered and analyzed using SPSS 6.0. SEASON LENGTHS AND BAG LIMITSHunters enjoyed a 16-day early (September) teal season with a 4-bird daily bag limit, a 15day/2-bird (or 5-bird) early (September) Canada goose season, a 60-day/6-bird duck season, and a 54,800 statewide Canada goose quota (season dates and lengths varied according to zone).See Appendix C for details of season dates, legal shooting hours, and bag limits. RESULTS Waterfowl Harvest and Days AfieldThe number of waterfowl hunters increased from 56,954 during the 2000-2001 season to 59,029 during the 2001-2002 season, which represents a 3.6% increase in hunters (Table 1).Hunters reported spending 1,337,297 days afield in 2001-2002, an increase of 20% from the 1,115,076 days recorded for 2000-2001.The waterfowl harvest decreased 1.7% from 708,092 during 2000-2001 to 695,790 during 2001-2002.One-third (33%) of the hunters hunted ducks only, whereas 10% hunted geese only, and 57% hunted both ducks and geese (Table 2). TealThe number of early (September) teal hunters increased 17% from 14,733 during 200014,733 during -200114,733 during to 17,222 during 200114,733 during -2002 (Table 3) (Table 3).Days afield also increased 17% from 52,229 during 200052,229 during -200152,229 during to 61,199 during 200152,229 during -200252,229 during .The 200152,229 during -2002 hunters harvested 36,013 blue-winged teal (Anas discors)green-winged teal (A.crecca), a decrease of 6.7% compared to the previous year's harvest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».