MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2104909839 · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00174.x

Teaching and Learning Guide for: Youth (and) Violence

2008· article· en· W2104909839 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Bryan Hogeveen

Notice bibliographique

RevueSociology Compass · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueBullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHollywoodContext (archaeology)MasculinityReputationEntertainmentSociologyContradictionCriminologyMedia studiesSocial psychologyPsychologyGender studiesLawHistoryPolitical scienceSocial scienceEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Author's introduction By reflecting on violence in its many manifestations this course is intended to problematize youth's relationship to violence. Not only will it underscore how and why violence is perpetrated by young people, but, perhaps more important, how young people are affected. Students will reflect on how violence impacts and enters their own lives – sometimes in very inauspicious ways. Much of what counts as entertainment is laden with, and centres on, violence. For example, Grand Theft Auto is a popular video game wherein game players assume the role of a wannabe gangster whose rise though the criminal underworld is predicated upon his thieving and murderous efficiency. Similarly, the movie Never Back Down follows a young male as he attempts to fight his way into the vaunted inner circle of his high school's ‘in’ group. Marred by and revered for his reputation as a ‘tough guy’, the protagonist is forced, in a contradiction that only makes coherent sense in the context of the pervasive violent masculinity which buoys the film, to fight his way clear of this foul reputation. Human intersections with violence are undeniably and unexpectedly complicated. We are fascinated and our lives are directly affected by violence regardless of proximity. Significantly, violence – both the Hollywood version and that which is ‘real’– affects each and all. Fears of violence, whether they are informed by official statistics, crime‐based dramas, the 6 o’clock news or reality television, contour our existence in very definite ways. Our temporal and spatial movement through urban space, our understandings of law and governance strategies, our relations with ‘others’– significant and otherwise – are conditioned by tangential, lived, experienced and witnessed violence. It alters our way of being, where we choose to live, and how we conduct, protect and entertain ourselves. No one is immune. Human experience is contoured irrevocably by violence. At issue is our inconsistent and contradictory relationship to youth violence. Parents applaud young people's violence – especially their sons’– as they ‘duke it out’ on the football field and in the hockey arena and urge them to ‘get’ or ‘kill’ the other team. At the same time, young people are overrepresented as victims of violence – especially our daughters. This course provides an opportunity to explore and analyze how youth [and] violence is braided into the fabric of Western culture. Starting points/learning objectives What follows are issues students should consider and meditate on throughout the term. I encourage readers to introduce them at the beginning of the semester and return to them several times throughout. They may also be used to frame study questions and as a course summary. What is violence? Why is there such growing concern about youth violence? What role does the media play in our understanding of youth violence? How are youth gangs perceived? What is the relationship between youth and violence? What is the connection between masculinity(ies) and violence? How does Western culture champion and, at the same time, abhor youth violence? What are ‘solutions’ to youth violence? What role can youth play in this process? Author recommendations Hannah Arendt, 1970, On Violence . New York, NY: Harcourt Brace. Following her tumultuous experiences of living through the Second World War and student protests of the 1960s, Hannah Arendt penned her reflections on violence. She famously writes that, ‘Violence can always destroy power; out of the barrel of a gun grows the most effective command, resulting in the most instant and perfect obedience. What never can grow out of it is power’ (53). She maintains that even though power and violence may hold phenomological elements in common, they are in fact opposites: ‘where the one rules absolutely, the other is absent. Violence appears where power is in jeopardy, but left to its own course it ends in power's disappearance’ (56). Arendt develops this line of argument later in the book and concludes that, ‘Every decrease in power is an open invitation to violence – if only because those who hold power and feel it slipping from their hands ... have always found it difficult to resist the temptation to substitute violence for it’ (87). For Arendt, worlds (both individual and global) become irrevocably altered through incidences of violence. She writes, ‘the practice of violence, like all action, changes the world, but the most probable change is to a more violent world’ (80). Arendt's reflections occasion an opportunity to reflect not only on interpersonal violence, but perhaps more important, state violence. Fearnley, Fran (ed.). 2004. I wrote on all Four Walls: Teens Speak Out on Violence . Toronto, Canada: Annick. How do youth experience violence? This collection contains the captivating stories of nine affected youth whose voices narrate experiences of being victims and instigators of violence. Their stories evidence the complexities of violence. They demonstrate how a great deal of slippage exists between the categories of victim and offender. Instead of being clear cut, the spellbinding tales evidence how the line separating the violent and the victim is often blurred. Most striking about this collection is the demand that adults listen to youth's voices. Tragically, youth are too often the objects of social regulation and academic discourse without being its authors. This collection forces the reader to consider what role, if any, youth voices may play in the amelioration of violence. Loeber, Rolf and David P. Farrington (eds.). 1998. Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Co‐edited by Rolf Loeber and David Farrington, this impressive collection offers innovative and insightful essays centring on the aetiology and trajectory of violent youth. This report of the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention's focus group on serious and violent offenders asks the reader to reflect on well‐worn assumptions. Instead of attending to single and static causal explanations of youth violence, the authors identify significant risk and resiliency factors. Collectively, the 17 chapters argue for more proactive responses to youth violence that attend to the complexity of juvenile development. The authors maintain that effective reforms and interventions can be implemented only when predictable assemblages of risk and protective factors are isolated. This volume of essays is impressive for the surfeit of data on risk and resiliency. Messerschmidt, James. 2000. Nine Lives: Adolescent Masculinities, The Body and Violence . Boulder, CO: Westview Press. No list of recommended readings on violence would be complete without at least one of James Messerschmidt's splendid books. In addition to Nine Lives , his Masculinities and Crime and Flesh and Blood are equally impressive. Tying these works together is the author's insistence that masculini

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,421
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,826

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0030,003
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4210,310

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,285 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSociology CompassMême sujetBullying, Victimization, and AggressionTravaux en français237 207