“Throwing in the Spatula”: A qualitative study examining pharmacists' decisions to become physicians
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives: To describe and examine the experiences of pharmacists who had become physicians. Method: A key informant approach was utilized to identify potential participants in this study, which involved a semi- structured interview. Field notes and transcripts were produced, coded and categorized, and an inductive analysis method was used to generate themes that were confirmed with subsequent interviews. Results: A total of 32 pharmacist-physicians participated in this study. All participants had practiced as pharmacists prior to beginning medical school. For most participants, intrinsic motivational factors to study medicine were very strong, while extrinsic motivational factors were cited as reasons to study pharmacy. The experience of medical school, and approaches to medical education were compared and contrasted with pharmacy; while pharmacy was described as more collegial, friendly and supportive, medical (particularly practice-based) education was described as more relevant and focused. Striking differences emerged between male and female participants regarding satisfaction with the decision to pursue medicine as a career; male participants were generally positive about their decision, while female participants were somewhat more nuanced or ambivalent regarding change in their profession. Conclusions: Examining the experiences of individuals who are both physicians and pharmacists provides an informative vehicle for examining differences and similarities in professional education, training and culture. While further work is necessary to more clearly examine these issues, this study provides an important insight into the ways in which pharmacists and physicians relate to one another and their own professional cultures.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle