CANADIAN IMMIGRATION POLICY AND PRACTICE: SOME SOCIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the 'Vertical Mosaic', John Porter noted that a considerable flow of post war immigrants to Canada were highly skilled and educated. During the mid-1960's the major functional requirements of the Canadian social system as it affected immigration was the requirement for increasing proportions of skilled and educated immigrants to meet the skill demands of Canada's booming economy. As a result of this, it was hypothesized that 1. there would be an increasing proportion of immigrants intending higher occupational class levels, 2. race and ethnicity would be progressively reduced as a criterion for selecting immigrants, 3. family connection would be less of a factor in selecting immigrants intending to enter the labour force. It was found that the basis for realizing these expected changes had been written into the Immigration Regulations; especially in the amendments to the Immigration Act of 1962 and 1967. With the introduction, in 1967, of the points system for selecting immigrants, racial and ethnic discrimination was officially eradicated as a criterion governing the admission of immigrants. Instead 'independent' applicants were to be selected on the basis of skills, education, occupational demand, area demand and some other factors. It was suggested that the two most important criteria which would ultimately determine an immigrant's admissibility were 'occupational demand' and the 'area demand' for that occupation. Also, under a separate points system 'nominated' relatives were also subject to skills and educational selection criteria as well. The hypotheses were generally confirmed. It was found that the skill levels of immigrants in the 1960's had increased very dramatically. The proportion of immigrants who had formerly been discriminated against the most, racially and ethnically, had also increased considerably. In the case of family oriented immigration, it appeared that the proportion of nominated immigrants may have decreased considerably. In accounting for these expected changes several factors were noted. However it must be stressed that due to the wide scope of the research that many new hypothesis were suggested and much further research proposed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,029 | 0,020 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».