MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2106821107

Women in the World of the Earliest Christians: Illuminating Ancient Ways of Life

2009· book· en· W2106821107 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typebook
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Établissements canadiensSt. Francis Xavier University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSkepticismInterpretation (philosophy)LiteratureJudaismHermeneuticsScrutinyNew TestamentHistoryBiblical criticismSociologyPhilosophyLiterary criticismClassicsEpistemologyArtTheologyLinguistics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)The focus of this book is made clear by a careful reading of the title: This is a book about in the world of the earliest Christians and not a survey of references to in early Christian texts. Distinguishing her work from previous studies on in the Gospels or the Pauline Churches, Lynn H. Cohick describes her volume as a prolegomena to the study of New Testament women (24). She is especially interested in the story of the average woman recovered through detailed analysis of pagan and Jewish sources mainly from the time of Alexander the Great's conquests to the turn of the first century C.E. New Testament texts are considered at various junctures with an emphasis on comparison, but they are not the main focus of this book.The book is deeply and self-consciously a historical study and not a theological one. Cohick is critical of failures to engage in proper interpretation or historical scrutiny in an effort to safeguard canonical authority, but also of extreme skepticism about the ability of texts to reveal significant information about real women's experiences. Her historical approach is amplified by other methods including the use of social-scientific models and literary critique, but she is explicit about using sparingly the hermeneutics of suspicion, the interpretive approach that questions the objectiveness of the author's description (27). From feminist critiques she draws important insights on gender construction, but particularly important, especially in light of many recent studies, is her statement: reject the postmodern conclusion that rhetoric is reality and the attending corollary that is lost behind this veil. Although texts and even inscriptions follow customs of propriety, I maintain that these pieces of information are attached to retrievable history (28).The chapters are organized largely in terms of the following major categories: familial relationships, religions and occupations, and benefaction and patronage. Chapter 1 is focused on a woman's role as daughter in relation to both parents and siblings, but also includes discussion of infanticide, maternal bonds, and inheritance rights and how the marriage of daughters affected the family dynamics more broadly, including social standing. Chapter 2 concentrates on the ideal wife--the Roman matron--who functions as literary trope in ancient literature. Cohick examines the influence of Augustus and his legislation, evidence for what scholars have termed the woman, negative portrayal of wives, and descriptions of the dining and bathing practices of wives. Chapter 3 moves from wife as ideal construct to historical realities. Here we find an examination of how the parameters and responsibilities of wives, and the realities of divorce, remarriage, and concubinage, intersected with other factors such as wealth, citizenship and slavery. Chapter 4 is a particularly helpful chapter, bringing together much new research on motherhood and exploring such topics as childbirth, grief, caring for infants, and children's education.Chapter 5 shifts from family life in the first instance to consider the religious activities of gentile women, ranging from their involvement in the domestic cult, to Vestal Virgins and the cults of the Bona Dea and Dionysus. The chapter also includes discussion of descriptions of female conversion by male writers and of God-fearers--Gentile who were associated with the synagogue, some of whom became attracted to early Christianity. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,367
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,042
Tête enseignante GPT0,219
Écart entre enseignants0,177 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations30
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetBiblical Studies and InterpretationTravaux en français237 207