MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2106896049 · doi:10.1353/nin.2014.0022

Burleigh Grimes: Baseball’s Last Legal Spitballer by Joe Niese (review)

2014· article· en· W2106896049 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael Sokolow

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAmateurLeagueChampionshipCasualMedalClubLawArtSociologyManagementArt historyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Burleigh Grimes: Baseball’s Last Legal Spitballer by Joe Niese Michael Sokolow Joe Niese. Burleigh Grimes: Baseball’s Last Legal Spitballer. Jefferson nc: McFarland, 2013. 244 pp. Paper, $29.95. The 1920s was one of the most significant periods in the history of professional baseball. The sport transitioned away from the dead-ball era into a time of legendary offensive production, and a new generation of star hitters brought unprecedented popularity to the game. At the same time, over the course of the decade, one dominant pitcher led all of baseball in wins, complete games, and innings pitched, while finishing second in strikeouts. This player was Burleigh Grimes, a fierce competitor who antagonized a panoply [End Page 149] of baseball people and ex-wives throughout his long career. Yet Grimes remains a lesser-known figure in the pantheon of Hall of Famers, a situation that Joe Niese seeks to remedy in his detailed and engaging biography. Burleigh Grimes was born in rural Wisconsin in 1893. His father, a farmer and sometimes day laborer, played for and managed the town baseball team, which competed with others throughout the region. Young Burleigh began by playing on the town’s juvenile team, then in high school, and eventually for his father’s club. He developed a reputation for his competitiveness and also his skill at throwing his specialty pitch: the spitball. During the early 1900s, when Grimes came of age as a pitcher, the spitter was still legal at every level of amateur and professional baseball. Pitchers were permitted to lubricate their fingers before throwing the ball, resulting in pitches that had less backspin and dropped more unpredictably than conventional fastballs. After experimenting with several different substances, Grimes settled on a natural slippery elm bark that was readily available around his Wisconsin farm. He would use the same slimy lubricant for nearly thirty years on the pitcher’s mound. In his late teens, Grimes embarked on a professional baseball career, playing for several minor-league teams before being called up by the Pittsburgh Pirates in 1916. He spent the next eighteen years pitching for seven majorleague clubs, including the Pirates, Brooklyn Dodgers, New York Giants, Chicago Cubs, and the St. Louis Cardinals. As a major leaguer, he amassed 270 victories and pitched 314 complete games, played with thirty-six Hall of Fame teammates, and appeared in four World Series, winning one in 1931 with St. Louis. He also hit over .300 twice in his career and hit 62 doubles, showing some batting skill as well. Along the way, Grimes antagonized countless players, fans, umpires, managers, and front-office personnel with his style of play and general cantankerousness. He tyrannized friend and foe alike, throwing beanballs at opposing hitters and berating his own team for defensive miscues. Nearly every spring, he held out for contracts that would pay him more money, demanding $25,000 a season even at the height of the Great Depression. He got into fistfights with his managers and altercations with his teammates; and over the course of his life, he married five times, twice ending in contentious divorce proceedings. Grimes’s combative attitude persisted after his playing days ended, as he embarked on a mediocre managing career marred by numerous game ejections, tirades against his young players, and eventual firings. Eventually he found long-term employment as a major-league scout; and by the time he was elected to the Hall of Fame in 1964, Grimes had mellowed considerably. Joe Niese tells the story of Burleigh Grimes in marvelous detail, enriching [End Page 150] the bare numbers with anecdotes culled from a wide range of published sources. One of the strongest sections of the book is the opening chapter on Grimes’s upbringing in Clear Lake, Wisconsin. Niese provides tremendous insight into how deeply baseball was woven into the fabric of midwestern farm life at the dawn of the twentieth century, when players traveled to town games by horse and buggy and spent the off-season working as lumberjacks, farmers, or in burgeoning industrial jobs. He also takes pains throughout the book to craft an honest portrayal of Burleigh Grimes as he truly was, warts and all. Niese...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,055
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,184

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0550,022

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,198
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207