Clinical instructor's behavior: Nursing student's perception toward effective clinical instructor's characteristics
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background and Aim: Clinical training as the core of nursing education is a significant and essential component for development of professional nurses. The quality of clinical instructor’s behavior plays a significant role in the learning process of the students, especially in clinical practice. The aim of the study was to assess the clinical instructor’s behaviors and nursing students’ perceptions toward effective clinical instructor's characteristics that facilitate learning process. Methods: Setting: The current study was conducted at Faculty of Nursing, Cairo University. Design: Descriptive, correlational design was utilized for the current study. Sample: A convenient sample of 333 was drawn from nursing students in different levels of baccalaureate nursing programs who had finished at least two clinical rotations with patient care. Tools: The Nursing Clinical Teacher Effective Inventory (NCTEI) was used for data collection. Results: Findings of the current study revealed that the highest ranked clinical instructor’s behavior as reported by the student’s was teaching ability category followed by evaluation and nursing competence respectively. Regarding effective clinical instructor’s characteristics as perceived by students, the highest ranked one was teaching ability category followed by nursing competence and evaluation respectively. The personality and interpersonal relationship among nursing student set as the fourth and fifth factors that affect learning process in the clinical settings. Conclusions: Effective clinical instructor's characteristics that affect learning process as perceived by nursing student include matching clinical teaching abilities, nursing competence and evaluation to student understanding and experience. Also, the nursing students considered the personality and interpersonal relationship is very important characteristics to provide support and encouragement to the student during clinical practice. Recommendation: Workshops/seminars should be organized and also orientation program for all newly clinical instructors on their roles in clinical teaching. These findings may help faculty to be pleased about students’ views and acknowledge the areas of success as well as areas that needs improvement.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle