MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2107277189 · doi:10.1093/jac/dkt008

Ability of the VITEK(R) 2 system to detect group B streptococci with reduced penicillin susceptibility (PRGBS)

2013· letter· en· W2107277189 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kouji Kimura, Noriyuki Nagano, Yoshiko Nagano, Jun-ichi Wachino, Keigo Shibayama, Y. Arakawa

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2013
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeonatal and Maternal Infections
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesTakeda Science Foundation
Mots-clésStreptococcus agalactiaePenicillinGroup BStreptococcusMedicineAntibioticsMicrobiologyBreakpointSepsisMeningitisInternal medicineBiologyPediatricsBacteriaGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Sir, Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae, GBS) is the leading cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis and an important pathogen among elderly people and those suffering from underlying medical disorders. The highest GBS mortality and morbidity result from invasive infections in neonates. Approximately 5% of GBS-infected infants die and survivors often suffer from severe neurological sequelae. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended by the CDC and is prescribed for pregnant women who have GBS isolated from vaginal specimens. Since the introduction of prophylaxis, the rate of GBS infection during the first post-natal week has decreased. Penicillins are the first-line agents in the prophylaxis and treatment of GBS infections because all clinical GBS isolates have been considered to be uniformly susceptible to b-lactams, including penicillins. However, we identified and characterized several GBS isolates demonstrating reduced penicillin susceptibility (PRGBS) through acquisition of multiple mutations in the penicillin-binding protein 2X (pbp2x) gene, and similar isolates were reported in the USA, Canada and Japan. After our research was published, EUCAST (http://www.eucast.org/clinical_ breakpoints/) defined a clinical penicillin MIC breakpoint for Streptococcus groups A, B, C and G, together with the penicillin MIC resistance breakpoint (.0.25 mg/L). The EUCAST breakpoint is higher than the breakpoint for penicillin susceptibility set by the CLSI (≤0.12 mg/L). Until recently, PRGBS were isolated from respiratory specimens, blood, decubitus ulcers and adult hip-joint fluid, – 8 with no report of PRGBS isolated from neonates or vaginal specimens of pregnant women. The isolation rate of PRGBS from various sources is approximately 2.3% in Japan. The MICs of penicillin G for PRGBS (0.25–1 mg/L) are near the breakpoint set by the CLSI (≤0.12 mg/L). Therefore it is unclear whether automated susceptibility testing machines such as VITEK 2 can detect PRGBS accurately. Because the VITEK 2 system is widely used in clinical laboratories in Japan, we used this system as an example in order to evaluate the ability of automated susceptibility testing machines to detect PRGBS. The MICs of penicillin G were determined for 28 PRGBS using the agar dilution method as per CLSI recommendations. Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as a quality control for MIC measurements. It was confirmed that these PRGBS harboured the amino acid substitutions in pbp2x genes, as described previously. We performed the determination of the MICs of penicillin G for 28 PRGBS three times using the VITEK 2 compact system with AST-P546 cards (bioMerieux Clinical Diagnostics, Marcy l’Etoile, France) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The results of the comparison between the MICs of penicillin G for 28 PRGBS, as determined by agar dilution and the VITEK 2 system, are shown in Table 1. Although the MICs determined by the agar dilution method were 0.25–1 mg/L [above the breakpoint (≤0.12 mg/L) set by the CLSI], the MICs determined by the VITEK 2 system were ≤0.12–1 mg/L. The MICs determined by the VITEK 2 system were ≤0.12 mg/L in 38 instances (38/84, 45.2%; 84 instances1⁄428 strains×3 times). The number of strains for which the MICs determined by the VITEK 2 system were ≤0.12 mg/L at least two of three times was 13 (13/28, 46.4%). In this study, we investigated the ability of the VITEK 2 system to detect PRGBS. It detected only half of the PRGBS in this study. Automated susceptibility testing machines such as VITEK 2 are used in clinical settings worldwide, and these results suggest that many PRGBS may be misclassified as ‘susceptible’ to penicillin G. We recently revealed that PRGBS tends to be resistant to fluoroquinolones and macrolides, in addition to having reduced penicillin susceptibility, indicating that the classification of susceptibility to penicillin G is very important. The worldwide misclassification of PRGBS as ‘susceptible’ to penicillin G is undesirable and hinders attempts to clarify the clinical significance of reduced susceptibility to penicillin G. The MICs of penicillin G for PRGBS (0.25–1 mg/L) are near the ‘susceptible’ breakpoint (≤0.12 mg/L) set by the CLSI, while the MICs of oxacillin (2–8 mg/L) and ceftizoxime (4–128 mg/L) for PRGBS are higher than those of penicillin-susceptible GBS. However, the VITEK 2 system AST-P546 cards for S. agalactiae do not include MIC determinations of oxacillin or ceftizoxime. We believe that inclusion of these MICs would enable more accurate detection of PRGBS by automated susceptibility testing machines. Moreover, it would be better for these machines to contain systems to alert operators to PRGBS-suspicious isolates when the MICs of penicillin G indicate a range near the susceptibility breakpoint, e.g. at 0.12 mg/L.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,114
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyMême sujetNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsTravaux en français237 207