Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Campus of Vienna from July 1 to 3, 2010.The conference is one of a series of events supported and/or organized by the University of Vienna's Forum for Interdisciplinary Dialogue (IDee).The 358-page volume begins with a preface by the three editors (pp.v to xiii).They describe the background for the conference and edited volume, and discuss the complex "threefold challenge" in organizing the conference: (i) the meanings and methods of interdisciplinary research, (ii) the complexity of migration and how to study it, and (iii) "the complex (socio-/geo-) political dimensions associated with migrations and the (all too) often unvoiced presuppositions."The main body of the volume consists of the papers presented at the conference.The papers are grouped into eight parts and themes.Part I, Interdisciplinary Approaches: Theories and Methodologies, has four papers.There are five papers in Part II, Peer Relations among Immigrant Adolescents: Methodological Challenges and Key Findings.Part III, Migration, Identity, and Belonging, and Part IV, Ego Documents Entered Migration History, each has a brief introduction followed by three papers.Part V, Debating Migrations, has five papers.There are two papers in Part VI, Diffusion and Spread in the Natural Sciences and Beyond.Part VII, Media Representations of Migrants and Migration, has a brief introduction, followed by two papers.The final part, Part VIII, Migration and the Genes, also has two papers, preceded by an introduction.Brief biographies of the editors and contributors are on pages 341-352, and the volume concludes with an index.Reviewing an edited volume poses distinct challenges compared to reviewing a book written by one or more authors on a particular subject.First, there is the wide range of specific topics included, even though they are intended to relate to migration.In this volume, the papers address peer relations among migrant youths, bullying and victimization in ethnically diverse schools, identity and belonging issues, the role of the media in perpetuating racism and anti-migrant attitudes, "barbarians" and the fall of the Roman Empire, and discourse analysis of the "parasite" and "fluidity" metaphors when used with reference to migration (for example, "migrants first trickle in, then turn into streams and at last flood a peaceful country;" p. 206).Related to the first challenge is a second challenge, where contributors use different data, theoretical perspectives, and methodologies.Thus, there are contributions from a wide range of scholars, including psychologists, historians, anthropologists, linguists, physicists, geneticists, botanists, and several others from fields such as communication, discourse, intercultural studies, and transnational studies.The latter fields usually try to bridge multiple disciplines, but most of the scholars from these fields appear to be from the humanities.A third challenge of this volume is its historical and geographical diversity.For example, there is a paper on migration in ancient Egypt by an Egyptologist;
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».