MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2107407009 · doi:10.1002/ebch.521

Cochrane review: Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants

2010· article· en· W2107407009 sur OpenAlexaff
Arne Ohlsson, Sanjay M Aher

Notice bibliographique

RevueEvidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeonatal Health and Biochemistry
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineRetinopathy of prematurityCochrane LibraryLow birth weightErythropoietinPediatricsBirth weightRelative riskRandomized controlled trialPlaceboPeriventricular leukomalaciaBlood transfusionGestational ageObstetricsPregnancyInternal medicineConfidence interval

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Low plasma levels of erythropoietin (EPO) in preterm infants provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anaemia. Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of early initiation of EPO in reducing red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Search strategy The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( The Cochrane Library) , MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, abstracts from scientific meetings published in Pediatric Research and reference lists of identified trials and reviews were searched through July 2009. Selection criteria Randomised or quasi‐randomised controlled trials of early (< 8 days of age) initiation of EPO treatment vs. placebo or no intervention in preterm and/or low birth weight neonates. Data collection and analysis Data collection and analysis were accomplished using the methods of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group. Main results Update includes 27 studies that enrolled 2219 preterm infants. Early EPO reduced the risk of the "use of one or more RBC transfusions" [typical RR; 0.80 (95% CI 0.75, 0.86); 16 studies, 1825 infants]. Early EPO led to a significant reduction in the total volume (ml/kg) of blood transfused per infant and in the number of transfusions per infant. Two studies (n = 188) reported a significant reduction in the number of donors to whom the infant was exposed. There was a significant increase in the risk of stage ≥ 3 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the early EPO group [typical RR; 1.65 (95% CI 1.12, 2.43); 8 studies, 984 infants]. The rates for mortality and other neonatal morbidities were not significantly changed by early EPO treatment nor were neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months in the small number of infants tested to‐date. Authors' conclusions Early administration of EPO reduces the use of RBC transfusions and the volume of RBCs transfused. These small reductions are of limited clinical importance. Donor exposure is probably not avoided since most studies included infants who had received RBC transfusions prior to trial entry. There was a significant increase in the rate of ROP (stage ≥ 3). Early EPO does not significantly decrease or increase any of the other important adverse outcomes. Ongoing research should deal with the issue of ROP and evaluate the current clinical practice that will limit donor exposure. Due to the limited benefits and the increased risk of ROP, early administration of EPO is not recommended. Evidence is lacking for the possible neuroprotective role of EPO in preterm infants. Plain Language Summary Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants In newborn infants, the number of red blood cells in the circulation decreases after birth. In infants born before term, this decrease is exaggerated by frequent withdrawal of blood, which may be necessary to monitor the infant's clinical condition. Therefore, infants born before term are likely to require transfusions of red blood cells. Low levels of erythropoietin (EPO), a substance in the blood that stimulates red blood cell production, in preterm infants provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anemia. EPO can be given "early" (before the infant reaches eight days of age) in order to prevent or decrease the use of red blood cell transfusions. More than 2200 infants born before term have been enrolled in 27 studies that used this approach. Early EPO treatment reduces the number of red blood cell transfusions and donor exposures following its use. However, the overall benefit of EPO may not be clinically important, as many of these infants had been exposed to red blood cell transfusions prior to entry into the trials. Treatment with early EPO did not have any important effects on mortality or common complications of preterm birth with the exception that EPO increased the risk for retinopathy of prematurity, a serious complication that may cause blindness in babies born before term. The addition of four new studies enrolling 145 infants did not change the conclusions. Based on our findings, EPO is not recommended for routine use in preterm infants.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,132
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,340
Écart entre enseignants0,323 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeRevue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEvidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review JournalMême sujetNeonatal Health and BiochemistryTravaux en français237 207