MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2108588252 · doi:10.2475/06.2008.03

Age, origin, and tectonic significance of Mesoproterozoic and Silurian felsic sills in the Berkshire massif, Massachusetts

2008· article· en· W2108588252 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican Journal of Science · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoGeological Survey of Canada
Organismes subventionnairesNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésMassifGeologyFelsicSillGneissOrogenyGeochemistryBasementPaleontologyPetrologyMetamorphic rockTectonicsMaficArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Discontinuous sills of felsic gneiss in the interior and western margin of the Berkshire massif and granite sills on the eastern margin of the massif were correlated by Ratcliffe (1984a, 1984b, 1985) and Ratcliffe and Hatch (1979), and interpreted by them as syntectonic anatectic melts that intruded Taconic thrusts. We dated three felsic gneiss sills and two granite sills in an attempt to constrain the age of Taconic thrusting, but discovered that the sills are not coeval. Rather, they were intruded during two widely separated episodes, one during the Mesoproterozoic at approximately 1000 Ma and the other during the Silurian at approximately 430 to 435 Ma. The 1000 Ma sills of felsic gneiss in the interior of the massif are located in Mesoproterozoic units and many of the mapped Taconic thrusts within the massif closely follow the distribution of this unit, here informally called the felsic gneiss of Harmon Brook. These 1000 Ma sills formed during the Ottawan or Rigolet orogeny and they have no connection to the Taconic orogeny. The 430 to 435 Ma granite sills along the eastern margin of the massif, informally called the granite of Becket Quarry, are found in both Mesoproterozoic basement and the Neoproterozoic Hoosac Formation. The sills are too young to have intruded during the Ordovician Taconic orogeny, but they may have formed during later faulting near the contact between Mesoproterozoic basement and Neoproterozoic cover rocks. The Tyringham Gneiss is one of the most common Mesoproterozoic units in the Berkshire massif. Zircons from the Tyringham Gneiss contain cores with oscillatory zoning and thin unzoned rims. The weighted average of eight ^206^Pb/^238^U analyses from the cores is 1179 +/- 9 Ma, whereas nine spot analyses from the rims yield an age of 1004 +/- 9 Ma. We interpret these two ages to represent the crystallization of the Tyringham Gneiss protolith and a subsequent high grade metamorphism, coeval with the intrusion of the felsic gneiss of Harmon Brook. The western contact between Mesoproterozoic rocks of the Berkshire massif and underlying Early Paleozoic rocks is clearly a thrust, but there is no independent evidence that movement occurred during the Taconic orogeny; displacement may also have occurred during the Silurian Salinic or the Devonian Acadian orogeny. Many contacts mapped as Taconic thrusts within the Berkshire massif follow the distribution of the 1000 Ma felsic gneiss of Harmon Brook. The age of the sills is clearly incompatible with this interpretation, and evidence for faulting along these mapped thrusts is lacking. Instead of being deformed into an imbricate stack, the massif behaved as a rigid block during Paleozoic uplift. Finally, the age of granite sills along the eastern margin of the massif does not constrain the basement-cover contact to be a Taconic thrust, as previously interpreted. The contact may be a Silurian fault, possibly related to extension and the opening of the Connecticut Valley trough as a back-arc basin. According to this model, the magma for the granite sills was generated above a west-dipping subduction zone under the Laurentian margin, which developed after the Taconic orogeny.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,005
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle