MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2108789898 · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1795

The psychosocial experiences of women with breast cancer across the lifespan: a systematic review protocol

2015· review· en· W2108789898 sur OpenAlexafffund
Heather J. Campbell‐Enns, Roberta L. Woodgate

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · 2015
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCancer survivorship and care
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Mots-clésPsychosocialBreast cancerDistressMedicinePopulationCancerQuality of life (healthcare)Social supportPsycho-oncologyDiseaseClinical psychologyPsychiatryPsychologyPsychotherapistNursingInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE: What are the psychosocial experiences of women with breast cancer across the lifespan, including similarities and differences in the psychosocial experiences of younger, middle-aged and older women with breast cancer? BACKGROUND: The experience of a life threatening illness, such as cancer, requires a person to consider an array of emotional, medical, social and existential demands. Specific to breast cancer, research shows that the experience of diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer may result in considerable distress.It is also known that a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer propels women into a time of uncertainty, that brings fear and emotional work. This disease oftentimes challenges a woman's identity, self-esteem, body image and relationships. However, even with these commonly felt distresses, most women adjust well to a breast cancer diagnosis and the treatments experienced, particularly if they do not experience a recurrence of cancer. Protective factors for distress include supportive care networks, such as family and support groups and professional resources provided by clinical staff, such as timely referrals to specialized services.Although most women adjust well to breast cancer, understanding distressing experiences among this population is crucial because, when experienced, the negative psychosocial impacts can be significant. Women who do experience distress due to breast cancer are at a risk of distress accompanying them through the breast cancer journey and impacting their long-term quality of life.Although literature suggests that the psychosocial experience of a breast cancer diagnosis may be different across the lifespan, less is known about the similarities and differences in the psychosocial experience between younger and older women with breast cancer. However, this studyexamines the experience of one age group and no comparisons between different age groups in this or other studies have been found at this time. Among what is known, younger women with breast cancer are at a heightened risk of anxiety and depression in comparison to older women and younger women experience more worries about their careers and finances than older women. There is also evidence that young women perceive their quality of life to be lower than older women as a result of breast cancer. This may be attributed to poorer emotional wellbeing, specific cancer-related concerns, depression and intrusive thoughts for this younger group. On the other hand, older women with breast cancer experience more health problems than younger women in survivorship, independent of receiving chemotherapy. In general, older breast cancer survivors experience overall better quality of life and mental health than their younger counterparts, but they tend to have poorer physical health and health-related quality of life due to comorbid conditions. Another risk factor for psychosocial distress is low income, which may be particularly salient for older women who are more likely to be on a fixed income than their younger counterparts. However, literature suggests that a higher degree of psychosocial adaptation can be found among older women with breast cancer because these women have had more life experience, including prior experiences with the health care system, witnessing the diagnosis of others with cancer, and having few competing demands. It is thought that these factors contributed to coping and successful adaption to the disease among older women.When studying how women acclimatize to breast cancer in the early stages of the cancer journey, it has been found that the main concerns for these women were concepts connected to identity. Breast cancer threatens women's self-integrity and the restructuring of life after a cancer diagnosis calls for the new experiences and feelings to be integrated into a revised self-narrative, sometimes referred to as 'meaning-making'. Little is understood about the differences between younger and older women in their construction of identity or how they make meaning in the context of breast cancer. What is known is that, for younger women, the diagnosis of cancer is shocking, and is an opportunity to contemplate mortality. Older women are more likely to approach their diagnoses in a matter-of-fact manner associated with the expected process of aging.The concept of body image can be found as a focus of breast cancer literature which describes the level of investment women put into their body in order to help them determine their wellbeing. The disruption of body image in breast cancer is attributed to hair loss, as well as changes in the breast and weight. Studies show younger women do seek normality in their breasts following mastectomy, and seek breast reconstruction more often than older women. Regarding older women with breast cancer, little is known about the experience of specific body image concerns, such as short- or long-term changes in the body due to treatment. It is known that older women with cancer experience body dissatisfaction and may even experience higher levels of dissatisfaction than younger women, possibly due to more persistent problems with the physical functioning of their body.It is also known that the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer affect relationships including spousal relationships, and relationships with children and older parents. As a woman with breast cancer experiences vulnerabilities, so too does her family. Spouses and partners of women with breast cancer work to adjust roles and to balance added household responsibilities, particularly during times of treatment. Children of women with breast cancer are impacted by the level of interaction with their mothers, with increased positive mother-child interactions associated with the increased wellbeing of family members. On the other hand, children are impacted negatively by a negative change in the mother's mood or marital tension. Lastly, parents of women with breast cancer are also affected since, they too, need to come to terms with the early timing of their daughters' diagnoses.Family relationships are vital for women with cancer because these relationships provide a high degree of social support, including emotional, tangible, informational and experiential support. Literature shows family relationships are improved for both younger and older breast cancer survivors. However, the intimate relationships of younger women are more likely to be strained in comparison to the intimate relationships of older women in the context of breast cancer survivorship. Also, younger adults with cancer experience increased loneliness, and a greater sense of isolation from peer and support networks than older adults perhaps because they perceive themselves to be different from their peers as a result of cancer.This incomplete understanding of the psychosocial experience of women with breast cancer across the lifespan requires an urgent need for research to facilitate a greater understanding of the psychosocial needs of these women. To allow for the effective delivery of appropriate cancer care support to these populations, a greater understanding of the unmet needs of these women must occur, including an understanding of the similarities and differences of younger and older women with this disease. A synthesis of literature from multiple contexts of the psychosocial experiences of younger and older women with breast cancer will add to the understanding of the experiences of these women. No systematic review on this topic was found when searching Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO and the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Étiquettes directes de modèles (non validées)

Étiquettes de catégorie et de devis d'étude par modèle, issues des rondes d'étiquetage. C'est une sortie machine, non validée, et le désaccord entre modèles est livré comme donnée. Aucun devis ici n'est encore validé contre MEDLINE.

BrasCatégoriesDevis d'étudeConfiance
gemmaaucune catégorie
Domaine: non disponible · Genre: Protocole
Porte sur le système de recherche canadien: non · Porte sur un sujet canadien: non
Sans objethigh
gptaucune catégorie
Domaine: non disponible · Genre: Protocole
Porte sur le système de recherche canadien: non · Porte sur un sujet canadien: non
Revue systématiquehigh
modèles en désaccordL'accord compare des ensembles de catégories et des devis identiques entre les bras.

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,032
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Protocole · Signal consensuel: Protocole
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,032
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,168

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0320,051
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0040,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0160,012
Bibliométrie0,0180,014
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0050,007
Science ouverte0,0040,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0300,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,071
Tête enseignante GPT0,465
Écart entre enseignants0,394 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Étiqueté directement par 2 modèles lisant le dossier complet.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.

Les modèles divergent sur des parties de cette classification; chaque voix est préservée dans la section en fin de page.

Devis d'étudeSans objet · Revue systématique
Domainenon disponible
GenreProtocole

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations115
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation ReportsMême sujetCancer survivorship and careTravaux en français237 207