Immediate-Early and Delayed Primary Response Genes Are Distinct in Function and Genomic Architecture
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The transcriptional program induced by growth factor stimulation is classically described in two stages as follows: the rapid protein synthesis-independent induction of immediate-early genes, followed by the subsequent protein synthesis-dependent induction of secondary response genes. In this study, we obtained a comprehensive view of this transcriptional program. As expected, we identified both rapid and delayed gene inductions. Surprisingly, however, a large fraction of genes induced with delayed kinetics did not require protein synthesis and therefore represented delayed primary rather than secondary response genes. Of 133 genes induced within 4 h of growth factor stimulation, 49 (37%) were immediateearly genes, 58 (44%) were delayed primary response genes, and 26 (19%) were secondary response genes. Comparison of immediateearly and delayed primary response genes revealed functional and regulatory differences. Whereas many immediate-early genes encoded transcription factors, transcriptional regulators were not prevalent among the delayed primary response genes. The lag in induction of delayed primary response compared with immediateearly mRNAs was because of delays in both transcription initiation and subsequent stages of elongation and processing. Consistent with increased abundance of RNA polymerase II at their promoters, immediate-early genes were characterized by over-representation of transcription factor binding sites and high affinity TATA boxes. Immediate-early genes also had short primary transcripts with few exons, whereas delayed primary response genes more closely resembled other genes in the genome. These findings suggest that genomic features of immediate-early genes, in contrast to the delayed primary response genes, are selected for rapid induction, consistent with their regulatory functions. The transcriptional program induced by growth factor stimulation is classically described in two stages as follows: the rapid protein synthesis-independent induction of immediate-early genes, followed by the subsequent protein synthesis-dependent induction of secondary response genes. In this study, we obtained a comprehensive view of this transcriptional program. As expected, we identified both rapid and delayed gene inductions. Surprisingly, however, a large fraction of genes induced with delayed kinetics did not require protein synthesis and therefore represented delayed primary rather than secondary response genes. Of 133 genes induced within 4 h of growth factor stimulation, 49 (37%) were immediateearly genes, 58 (44%) were delayed primary response genes, and 26 (19%) were secondary response genes. Comparison of immediateearly and delayed primary response genes revealed functional and regulatory differences. Whereas many immediate-early genes encoded transcription factors, transcriptional regulators were not prevalent among the delayed primary response genes. The lag in induction of delayed primary response compared with immediateearly mRNAs was because of delays in both transcription initiation and subsequent stages of elongation and processing. Consistent with increased abundance of RNA polymerase II at their promoters, immediate-early genes were characterized by over-representation of transcription factor binding sites and high affinity TATA boxes. Immediate-early genes also had short primary transcripts with few exons, whereas delayed primary response genes more closely resembled other genes in the genome. These findings suggest that genomic features of immediate-early genes, in contrast to the delayed primary response genes, are selected for rapid induction, consistent with their regulatory functions. The binding of growth factors to cell surface receptors leads to the activation of signaling pathways that ultimately control cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The critical targets of these signaling cascades include transcription factors, and many of the changes in cell behavior resulting from growth factor stimulation are because of altered programs of gene expression. The canonical model of a highly ordered program of gene expression induced by growth factor stimulation is the coordinate regulation of primary and secondary response genes. The initial transcriptional response to growth factor stimulation is the induction of ∼100 primary response genes (1Herschman H.R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1991; 60: 281-319Crossref PubMed Scopus (942) Google Scholar, 2Winkles J.A. Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 1998; 58: 41-78Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar). Induction of these genes does not require de novo protein synthesis and is therefore mediated by pre-existing transcription factors. Most of the characterized primary response genes (termed immediate-early genes) are maximally induced within 30 min of growth factor stimulation, although a few examples of primary response genes that are induced with slower kinetics have been described (3Burger C. Wick M. Brusselbach S. Muller R. J. Cell Sci. 1994; 107: 241-252Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 4Dixon B.S. Sharma R.V. Dennis M.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 13324-13332Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar, 5Freter R.R. Alberta J.A. Hwang G.Y. Wrentmore A.L. Stiles C.D. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 17417-17424Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar, 6Sewing A. Burger C. Brusselbach S. C. Muller R. J. Cell Sci. PubMed Google Scholar, M. R. J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of the characterized primary response genes transcription factors, secondary response genes as of a transcriptional program (1Herschman H.R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1991; 60: 281-319Crossref PubMed Scopus (942) Google Scholar, 2Winkles J.A. Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 1998; 58: 41-78Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar). response genes are induced than immediate-early genes, and their induction is from that of primary response genes in de novo protein the model of growth gene expression two the initial induction of primary response genes, followed by a of their mRNAs to the transcription factors that the secondary response genes. In this study, we expression to the program of transcriptional induced by growth factor stimulation of As expected, we identified of rapid and delayed gene inductions. Surprisingly, however, we that a large fraction of delayed did not require protein and therefore represented delayed induction of primary response genes rather than induction of secondary response genes. These that the transcriptional program induced by growth factor stimulation not the induction of immediate-early and secondary response genes also the induction of a large of delayed primary response genes that had been The delayed primary response genes from immediate-early genes in both their and genomic Whereas many immediate-early genes transcription factors, transcriptional regulators were not prevalent among the delayed primary response genes. transcriptional induction of immediate-early genes was with of these genes, of transcription factor binding sites in of this gene high affinity TATA in their promoters, and short primary transcripts with few In of these delayed primary response genes more closely resembled other genes in the genome. These findings immediate-early from delayed primary response genes in of both and transcriptional and suggest that immediate-early genes have been selected for rapid induction their as transcriptional In the slower induction of both delayed primary and secondary response genes is consistent with their as rather than of growth factor Cell and RNA were in with were by in for h and for the with growth factor growth growth immediate-early delayed primary response of gene RNA polymerase growth factor a that protein synthesis in was 30 min to RNA for transcription for and RNA was with RNA was to for and with to the RNA for was with followed by RNA with to were by from the in to a 30 and II with the were to the by the to the were with and a The were with of and for min in a of and the were in and and at for min to and with of of RNA was with the a for was to of and with were and with a to the 4 of both and were with a for min at and to a The were in a and in a for the were in with and and by at for The were with and with were were as to the R. S. R. and and in M. S. J. S. R. C. M. C. J. Biol. PubMed Google and were to gene expression. the genes with than to to and J. R. than were were to genes with that were of protein RNA was from with for 30 min followed by 4 h of two were with The compared and to whereas the other compared and to for and RNA transcription of of RNA was in and as by the a for of were with of the and in for were and abundance was with a of a was by a for were as described J. S. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google with was at 4 II were in high and in was with in to the transcription as in for and gene and genomic of transcription initiation sites and for were obtained from the to J. Nucleic Acids Res. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). transcripts have and transcripts to with were not in these the and genomic were from for were obtained from the for genes, and of was from the M. J.A. A. S. M. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of gene was with a S. M.J. PubMed Scopus Google by the of and the from genes the genes with at were in the of transcription factor binding sites in the of immediate-early and delayed primary response genes was as described J. S. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. S. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google the program M. S. in with transcription factor binding from S. A. M. Nucleic Acids Res. PubMed Scopus Google and Nucleic Acids Res. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the gene for both the immediateearly and delayed primary response gene were compared with the gene in the of genes a These genes were selected from genes not induced by the were The for and the sites within the of a of and were selected the at the of and R. M. J. A. A. A. M. Nucleic Acids Res. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). both the were to include that than in and that sites of at of the gene were with a J. R. Scholar). the of than of in the and at in of the genes were in the for immediateearly and delayed primary response genes were the with Nucleic Acids Res. PubMed Scopus Google and The to to to to to and to to the transcription initiation were for the 1998; PubMed Scopus Google TATA Biol. Google 1996; PubMed Scopus Google and J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google the within the was for genes the among transcripts were for gene in the of the of TATA was as described J. S. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). at of in of sites Nucleic Acids Res. PubMed Scopus Google and a of was was to the of TATA and of of for of gene expression and their and the of A. S. J. C. R. S. M. C. M. S. A. S. C. M. J. PubMed Scopus Google were a a transcription with and the were A. S. J. C. R. S. M. C. M. S. A. S. C. M. J. PubMed Scopus Google the to with at transcripts were with a was for of immediate-early genes, of delayed primary response genes, and of secondary response genes. for of in the primary response gene were of was to changes in gene expression growth factor stimulation of in the by growth factor J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Google Scholar). were by and to the cell by with for and 4 primary from secondary response genes, were also and 4 h of in the of the protein synthesis The for genes that were induced than are as a in are in Of a of 133 induced genes, 49 were induced by of immediate-early genes. of genes immediate-early genes as and In a of these genes were in the of as for immediate-early genes. In a of genes were induced h of The initial of 26 of these genes were at by as for secondary response genes that require de novo protein synthesis for These genes characterized secondary response genes, as (1Herschman H.R. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1991; 60: 281-319Crossref PubMed Scopus (942) Google and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Surprisingly, induction of the 58 genes was not by induction of these mRNAs h of is that the of primary response genes these delayed kinetics of induction primary response genes) both the of immediate-early genes and secondary response genes induced in these The induction kinetics of genes were with a and h of Consistent with the and S. S. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, J. PubMed Scopus Google two characterized primary response genes, and rapid that at h a secondary response was not induced h of and was by the In contrast to and delayed primary response genes, and slower and 4 h stimulation Consistent with the induction of these genes was not by their as delayed primary response genes. to the of a of genes and 4 h of in the and of were the of the genes were induced with kinetics in response to other than were with in the of Consistent with the obtained with and were induced as immediate-early genes, as a secondary response and and as delayed primary response genes both and from functional the delayed primary and secondary response genes were compared the of was by of the of in of genes compared with the in genes the The and that were and identified at of the genes in are in The immediateearly gene was highly in to transcriptional with and factor among the represented These were not in the delayed primary response secondary response genes the was highly in the immediate-early genes not in the delayed primary response secondary response genes These findings are consistent with the of immediate-early genes as transcription factors that secondary response genes. also suggest for the delayed primary response genes, as as for secondary response genes, compared with the immediate-early of binding binding factor binding protein binding binding in a of and kinetics of induction of immediateearly and delayed primary response genes from a of factors, in in transcription therefore a of and to of these of genes. we the of in the of the immediate-early and delayed primary response genes that the of their kinetics of genes transcription factor binding and of genes kinetics of induction to transcriptional of immediate-early and delayed primary response genes were therefore for transcription factor binding sites compared with a of genes that were in not induced by stimulation J. S. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. S. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). to and of as as the and were with the program from and a to the of and of identified transcription factors, factor represented by the and and growth response transcription factors, as in of the immediate-early genes the in In of the of delayed primary response genes binding for these other transcription transcription factor binding sites of immediate-early and delayed primary response in a The was with to binding sites that were in genomic of and The was with the sites in at the of a were The transcription factor binding with the are in in As as was also in the binding sites for response protein and were in the of immediate-early genes. these other transcription factor binding were in the of of the delayed response genes. were obtained The were also for in binding sites for transcription factors. The the TATA the 1998; PubMed Scopus Google the the Biol. Google the in 1996; PubMed Scopus Google and the J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google of immediate-early and delayed primary response genes were compared by of the of gene the for The within these were with the of for the immediateearly and delayed primary response genes were compared with and to a with the The a in the TATA for the immediate-early genes to for genes in the whereas in for the other were not immediateearly gene TATA were than for the delayed primary response genes In TATA of the delayed primary response genes did not from genes in the for genes in The of TATA for the immediate-early genes, and delayed primary response genes are in of more than of by protein in Nucleic Acids Res. PubMed Scopus Google was to a functional TATA J. S. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). this identified of genes with at a TATA a to other of TATA J. C. M. Biol. PubMed Google Scholar). this of immediate-early and of delayed primary response genes a TATA The TATA in immediate-early genes by from the In a of the and A. S. J. C. R. S. M. C. M. S. A. S. C. M. J. PubMed Scopus Google identified of transcription sites of the were in TATA A. S. J. C. R. S. M. C. M. S. A. S. C. M. J. PubMed Scopus Google we also compared the immediate-early and delayed primary response genes to the of transcription sites identified by sites were with for the was in the immediate-early gene whereas the delayed primary response genes a for the and in of the other were in primary response gene The transcripts with a transcription both primary response gene of the of the immediate-early genes of were as whereas of of the delayed primary response genes had These that the immediate-early genes have a to transcription from a initiation than delayed primary response genes other genes in the is also consistent with the of TATA in immediate-early gene RNA II at of and of transcription factor binding and TATA abundance of the immediate-early genes that the lag in delayed primary response gene expression from slower transcription initiation a of RNA polymerase II abundance at gene this II binding to of immediate-early and delayed primary response genes was by were with for h and to II the of II that of II was not by of II was at the transcription sites of immediate-early and delayed primary response genes of these genes had II that at the gene as as other control genes not the of genes of immediate-early genes and of delayed primary response II did not stimulation, a for gene II at transcription sites is not as and are examples of genes with a polymerase in their in A. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the immediate-early genes that in II had II at h of with their the delayed primary response genes that had increased II of and had II h of consistent with the that delayed of II a in their delayed inductions. the other of these delayed primary response genes and II h of to was for immediate-early genes and than their inductions. that the in induction for these genes the of II does not to a factor resulting in delayed was a in II the immediate-early and delayed primary response gene both and for the at II was the immediate-early genes had II than the delayed primary response genes for and at the of II with the in and transcription sites these two of genes. of of the genes by did not a in II is that transcriptional changes are not for the inductions. were with R. Sci. S. A. PubMed Scopus Google for delayed primary response genes stimulation of the genes increased and were to than the although II at these genes is not their transcription is induced The kinetics of synthesis for delayed primary response genes and two immediate-early genes and are in The for and at min of to induction at 30 of induction delayed primary response genes, were with examples in of these genes, the of and in the is compared in of the delayed primary response genes a in not h of these genes, the in transcription of was consistent with their delayed expression and of these genes, and also have delayed II with at h In delayed primary response genes with transcriptional kinetics to immediate-early genes, with induction of at min of These kinetics of synthesis are in with the II revealed II at the 30 min of The of these genes increased than their and that the initiation of transcription and the of elongation are resulting in delayed of delayed primary response genes delays in transcription of their These genes are in of kinetics of although is that both and the of elongation a in their delayed inductions. that although delays in transcription initiation the of elongation to the lag in expression of delayed primary response genes, other in transcription also to the in therefore other features that of transcription primary and of is a in gene in and sites a in the of primary response genes. therefore compared the and for the immediate-early and delayed primary response genes. was the of these of genes the primary and for immediate-early and delayed primary response genes were compared with other and to a of genes in the The a in both the primary and of immediate-early genes to the for In were these features of delayed primary response genes were compared with the the immediate-early primary transcripts were that of the delayed primary response genes and These in to other gene the lag in induction of delayed primary response genes to both primary and In this study, we have a comprehensive of the of gene induction growth factor stimulation of As expected, we identified both rapid and delayed gene resulting from genes were induced within 30 min of stimulation, as for immediate-early genes, whereas genes h of stimulation for Surprisingly, we that the of the genes induced with delayed kinetics were primary response genes, because their induction was not by The transcriptional program induced by growth factor stimulation of immediate-early genes, delayed primary response genes, and secondary response genes, for and of the genes induced within 4 h of stimulation, kinetics of induction of delayed primary response genes were in response to the and that their induction kinetics are not of delayed primary response genes have been by in primary (3Burger C. Wick M. Brusselbach S. Muller R. J. Cell Sci. 1994; 107: 241-252Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 6Sewing A. Burger C. Brusselbach S. C. Muller R. J. Cell Sci. PubMed Google Scholar, J. PubMed Scopus Google B.S. Sharma R.V. Dennis M.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 13324-13332Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google and R.R. Alberta J.A. Hwang G.Y. Wrentmore A.L. Stiles C.D. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 17417-17424Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar, M. R. J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google the large of primary response genes we to induced with delayed kinetics was a more regulatory in programs are represented as gene of genes secondary gene regulation to the canonical response gene to from in gene expression PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the high of delayed primary response genes, have for that regulatory from in gene expression. many genes that are induced with a lag growth factor stimulation are primary response genes, that delayed gene expression the induction of transcriptional delayed primary response genes represented a of the transcriptional response to growth factor stimulation, we both and to the of this of genes. to the delayed primary response genes with the immediateearly genes. the functional of the immediate-early and delayed primary response genes were compared the The immediate-early genes were in to transcriptional with their as transcriptional in the induction of secondary response genes. In the delayed primary response genes were not in to transcriptional regulation and had functional with the immediate-early genes. These suggest that the of immediateearly genes have in the transcriptional response to growth stimulation, whereas the delayed primary and secondary response genes as of this transcriptional program. In this is that was described as a secondary response gene in induction cell to growth factor stimulation 1991; Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). as a delayed primary response gene in the study, as as in Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google and A. Burger C. Brusselbach S. C. Muller R. J. Cell Sci. PubMed Google Scholar). also the for the kinetics of induction of immediate-early and delayed primary response gene of that both immediate-early and delayed primary response genes were induced at the transcriptional The of immediate-early genes were with the rapid of their The lag in induction of a of delayed primary response mRNAs to from a in transcription initiation the of as by the delayed of their In of other delayed primary response genes were that the lag in induction from delays in subsequent stages of transcriptional elongation processing. These the kinetics of induction of immediate-early and delayed primary response gene mRNAs to with a of factors, the over-representation of binding sites for transcription factors, gene and revealed in the of binding sites for transcription factors in the of immediate-early and delayed primary response genes. sites for and were in the of immediate-early genes compared with other genes that were in not induced by In binding sites for these other transcription factors were not of the delayed primary response genes. The of binding of the delayed primary response genes although immediate-early genes are by a of transcription factors, the delayed primary response genes are by a more of not identified as in the gene is that delayed primary response genes of transcription factor binding sites their than immediate-early genes, that the transcription factor binding sites of delayed primary response genes are affinity sites than of immediate-early genes, because affinity sites that are from the binding not in the of these factors the affinity of transcription factor binding to the of delayed primary response genes, their of transcriptional The of the immediate-early genes also from of the delayed primary response genes. In of the immediate-early genes affinity TATA than of the delayed primary response genes. the of TATA in the of immediate-early genes was than in the of delayed primary response genes in genes in the have in transcription with affinity TATA transcriptional the of immediate-early genes. the that the immediate-early genes have more initiation is the that these genes also have a for the by A. S. J. C. R. S. M. C. M. S. A. S. C. M. J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). because of the transcription initiation to II the of these factors the transcription high TATA in immediate-early affinity sites that rapid J. Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). of the of transcription Sci. S. A. PubMed Scopus Google and TATA binding of J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google a transcription factor that is to the Mol. Biol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). The in both transcription factor binding sites and are also consistent with in the binding of RNA polymerase II to the of immediate-early and delayed primary response genes. that II was to the of both immediate-early and delayed primary response genes in and that II increased the of of the genes in both growth factor transcriptional induction of the of immediate-early and delayed primary response genes from the of elongation by a rather than by of II to the These findings are consistent with of the transcription sites of immediate-early genes, and A. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. PubMed Scopus Google as as with that have at the of many genes in M. C. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). however, the of II to the of immediate-early genes was than that to the of delayed primary response genes. These in II a the immediate-early and delayed primary response gene with the in both transcription factor binding sites and TATA these findings to transcription and as of the primary for rapid of immediate-early genes to growth factor stimulation to the delayed primary response genes. also revealed the immediate-early and delayed primary response genes in both primary and The immediate-early genes to and than the delayed primary response genes, are in and to other genes in the genome. These features to the lag in expression of delayed primary response genes, for genes that a rapid induction of as by of the of primary and kinetics of expression. of that transcription of was to immediate-early genes, as and Consistent with rapid transcriptional induction, been to a of R. J. Biol. Chem. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the of was delayed by h compared with the lag in by the primary is more than the immediate-early gene primary and the of exons, is the of immediate-early gene the other delayed primary response a primary of exons, with that of the immediate-early genes. In contrast to transcriptional induction of is delayed for h growth factor stimulation, with increased II at therefore of a gene delayed induction from a lag in II and transcription immediate-early and delayed primary response genes to to the kinetics of induction of their The immediateearly genes are characterized by over-representation of binding sites for transcription factors in their with high affinity TATA and short primary transcripts few In of these the delayed primary response genes are to other genes in the genome. as also immediate-early from delayed primary response genes, as been for genes rapid delayed in response to other S. Scopus Google Scholar, R. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, S. S. J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). these of immediateearly genes were consistent in other cell we the features of immediate-early genes induced by the in and in in A. M. J. J. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). As in the immediate-early genes induced in both and over-representation of transcription factor binding sites for and were in and for immediate-early genes in and had TATA and as compared with the as a and the immediate-early genes induced in and by of genomic The features with rapid induction of immediate-early genes have been selected for the of immediate-early gene as transcriptional regulators that subsequent in gene expression in response to growth factor The rapid induction of immediate-early genes to in a response to In the lag in induction of both delayed primary and secondary response genes is consistent with the of these genes as rather than of growth factor immediate-early genes are not characterized by a of for protein synthesis to their transcriptional induction, also genomic features that have been selected to rapid are to for and of the and to and for with
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle