MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2110335694 · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq343

Triclosan Affects Thyroid Hormone-Dependent Metamorphosis in Anurans

2010· letter· en· W2110335694 sur OpenAlexaff
Caren C. Helbing, Graham van Aggelen, Nik Veldhoen

Notice bibliographique

RevueToxicological Sciences · 2010
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Établissements canadiensEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Victoria
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTriclosanMetamorphosisThyroidHormoneEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyChemistryZoologyMedicineEcologyPathologyLarva

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Our original work on Rana catesbeiana (bullfrog) tadpoles exposed to triclosan (TCS) during induction of precocious metamorphosis that was presented in Veldhoen et al. (2006) suggested that frog tadpoles exposed to the antibacterial agent exhibit changes through prometamorphosis. In a recent study, Fort et al. (2010) exposed premetamorphic Xenopus laevis tadpoles to triclosan for 21 days into prometamorphosis. This work, published in Toxological Sciences (Fort et al., 2010), stated that environmentally relevant TCS concentrations do not alter the normal course of thyroid-mediated metamorphosis in this standard anuran model. Herein, we describe the apparent discrepancy between these two studies, and on examination of the data presented in the study of Fort et al. (2010), we do not come to the same conclusion that triclosan had no effects on metamorphosis. Fort et al. (2010) stated that “larval developmental stage at exposure day 21 was not significantly different from controls based on observed parameters.” A major indicator of exposure effect is progression through the developmental stages as defined by Nieuwkoop and Faber (NF; Nieuwkoop and Faber, 1994). The relevant stages in the study are between NF stages 54 and 66; the range of stages attained by NF stage 51 tadpoles after 21 days of exposure. Even though these are numerical stages, they are categorical, defined by distinctive morphological characteristics. The number of tadpoles that were at these stages was reported in Table 3 of the study of Fort et al. (2010), and chi-square analysis was performed. The authors stated that “Overall, the frequency of each developmental stage in each of the treatment concentrations following 21 days of exposure to TCS was not significantly different from each other (chi-square, p = 0.319).” It was not clear how the analysis was done, but using the same data as presented in Table 3 in the study of Fort et al. (2010) in a 9 × 5 contingency table with NF 54–56, 63–64, and 65–66 stages grouped and all other stage categories kept separate gave a chi-square = 48.7, p = 0.029, degrees of freedom = 32. In addition, a pairwise 7 × 2 contingency table comparison of the control with each of the TCS treatments individually gave the results shown in Table 1. Chi-square analysis of NF developmental stage frequency attained by Xenopus laevis tadpoles at day 21 of TCS exposure. The frequency data was presented originally in Table 3 of Fort et al. (2010) Note. The NF 54–56 and 57 groups were not considered for this analysis because these groups contained values of zero. Chi-square analysis of NF developmental stage frequency attained by Xenopus laevis tadpoles at day 21 of TCS exposure. The frequency data was presented originally in Table 3 of Fort et al. (2010) Note. The NF 54–56 and 57 groups were not considered for this analysis because these groups contained values of zero. Therefore, the data presented by Fort et al. (2010) do indeed show that TCS at the three lower exposure concentrations had an effect on the postembryonic development of X. laevis tadpoles. This is consistent with our observations with the bullfrog (Veldhoen et al., 2006.). Moreover, the authors observed that tails from stage-matched NF 60 tadpoles showed significantly elevated thyroid hormone receptor β (TRβ) transcript levels in the two middle concentrations examined. The 1.5-fold increase observed relative to the control animals was interpreted as “likely not biologically significant,” and the authors point to a lack of concentration dependence of the TCS exposure on altered transcript abundance. Putting this information in context, TRβ transcript levels increase in the tadpole tail by approximately sevenfold between NF stages 54 and 60 (Wagner and Helbing, 2005). This implies that instead of the usual approximately sevenfold increase apparent in untreated animals, TCS-exposed Xenopus tadpoles showed a ∼10-fold increase. Such an increase in abundance of the TRβ transcript is highly suggestive of an accelerated metamorphosis program, and thus, the study of Fort et al. (2010) again supports the observation of a biological effect upon tadpole development following exposure to TCS. The changes in TRβ transcript levels noted by the authors are reminiscent of an “inverted U” response curve characteristic of an endocrine disruptor exposure event (Welshons et al., 2003). The lack of a concentration-dependent response at the time point examined referred to in the study abstract does not necessarily imply a lack of biological response. In summary, the overall conclusion and title of the study of Fort et al. (2010) does not properly reflect the data presented. Rather, the fact that the authors did not observe a change in thyroxine levels or thyroid histology, but did record changes in molecular and developmental endpoints, is useful in determining the mode of action of TCS on amphibian metamorphosis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,305 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations36
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueToxicological SciencesMême sujetEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsTravaux en français237 207